[3]
NOTE 8A
[8A]
- “I have sacrificed EVERYTHING for this family! My youth, my desires, my… my very soul has been dedicated to ensuring the survival of the Bridgerton name!
The Paradox of Violet Bridgerton’s Selective Apologies
“In the rigid hierarchy of the Regency Era, a parent offering an apology to a child was a revolutionary act. However, as seen in the complex relationship between Lady Violet and Anthony
While Violet eventually apologizes for her passive failures—her emotional absence following her husband’s death—she remains pointedly silent regarding her active destruction of Anthony’s happiness. By dehumanizing Siena Rosso as ‘a certain soprano’ and forcing Anthony to choose between his heart and his family name, she inflicted a trauma that an apology for ‘not being there’ cannot heal.
Anthony’s formal and cold acceptance of her words—notably his dismissive ’the past is the past’—reveals that true forgiveness is absent. Because Violet refuses to acknowledge the specific cruelty of her class-based interference, the emotional bridge between mother and son remains broken. Her ‘revolution’ of the heart is incomplete, proving that an apology without full accountability is merely a way to maintain social decorum rather than achieve genuine reconciliation.”
Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 8A
Opgeslagen onder Divers
NOTE 7A
[7A]
VIOLET’S SELECTIVE EXCUSES
VIOLET’S EXCUSES
[Almost literal text]
” “I am your mother, Anthony. And I owe you more apologies than I can ever possibly articulate. After your father died, I… I was not there. The grief was… it was all-consuming. And I allowed you to take on a burden that was too heavy for anyone, let alone an eighteen-year-old boy. I am so sorry. I failed you, Anthony. I failed to be a mother to you when you needed me most.”
…..
….
”””I am so sorry it was you who was with your father that day. And I am sorry for everything that happened in the days that followed. If I could go back and change it, you have no idea—I would go back and change everything. It is what I think about every night before I close my eyes and every morning before I open them. It will never go away.”
ANTHONY’S REACTION
Anthony: “There is no need for apologies. The past is the past.”
AI OVERVIEW
The Half-Apology: Why True Forgiveness is Impossible
Anthony’s reaction to Violet’s peace offering in Season 2 is calculated and distant because he knows she is still avoiding the core of the issue:
- The Unspoken Awareness: Anthony is fully aware that his mother saw his love for Siena and chose to sabotage it. Because he knows that she knows, her selective apology—focusing only on her grief for his father—feels incomplete and hollow to him.
- The Lukewarm Acceptance: This is why he accepts her excuses without any real warmth or enthusiasm. He performs the “dutiful son” one last time by nodding along, but he does not let her back into his heart. He gives her the politeness she requires, but denies her the intimacy she craves.
- The Self-Imposed Barrier: As you noted, by not being honest about Siena, Violet robs herself of the chance to be truly forgiven. Real forgiveness requires a full confession of the debt, and since she refuses to mention the “everything” he sacrificed, the debt remains between them.
- A Relationship of Form over Substance: The result is a relationship that remains functional but emotionally stunted. They may share a home and a name, but they no longer share a soul, because Violet is too afraid to face the reality of what she took from him.
The Bottom Line: Anthony’s coldness is the “price” Violet pays for her silence. She wanted him to be the Viscount of the house, and in doing so, she became a guest in his life rather than a confidante. By avoiding the truth about Siena, she secured her social standing but lost her son’s trust forever.
AI
Violet and Anthony / Violet’s Destructive Role in the Breakup of Anthony and Siena
The Seed of the Trauma
For the attentive viewer of Bridgerton, it is abundantly clear that the completely toxic and strained relationship between mother Violet and son Anthony in Season 2 — which manifests in Anthony’s coldness toward his mother — stems directly from his heartbreak over Siena Rosso and the destructive role his mother played in it. However, this trauma is more deeply rooted, tracing back to the parentification of Anthony following the sudden death of his father, Edmund, during which Violet drowned in her own grief and burdened her eighteen-year-old son with the heavy responsibilities of the family and the estate.
The Dehumanization of Siena Rosso
Although Violet’s social panic regarding a potential marriage to an opera singer within the Regency era was understandable due to the risk of social exclusion, her total lack of maternal care and her inhumane approach are unforgivable.
- Reduction to a Profession: When she first confronts Anthony, she refuses to call Siena by her name and speaks disparagingly of “a certain soprano.” In doing so, she reduces a living woman to an object and a scandal.
- Emotional Blackmail: She dismisses Anthony’s deep feelings as mere “infatuation” and misuses the memory of his deceased father to inflict guilt upon him.
The Emotional Chasm and the Conclusion
The coldness reaches its nadir when Anthony returns home after his near-death experience during the duel. Violet shows absolutely no genuine interest in his state of mind, but instead chatters superficially about the lace for Daphne’s wedding dress. Siena’s house offered him warmth; Violet’s house brought him nothing but rejection.
Violet’s defense that she had “good intentions” is not sufficient. Inflicting deep pain remains inflicting deep pain, regardless of the intention. She saved the Viscount, but in doing so, she almost lost her son.
ANOTHER FORMULATION
The Paradox of Violet Bridgerton’s Selective Apologies
“In the rigid hierarchy of the Regency Era, a parent offering an apology to a child was a revolutionary act. However, as seen in the complex relationship between Lady Violet and Anthony
While Violet eventually apologizes for her passive failures—her emotional absence following her husband’s death—she remains pointedly silent regarding her active destruction of Anthony’s happiness. By dehumanizing Siena Rosso as ‘a certain soprano’ and forcing Anthony to choose between his heart and his family name, she inflicted a trauma that an apology for ‘not being there’ cannot heal.
Anthony’s formal and cold acceptance of her words—notably his dismissive ’the past is the past’—reveals that true forgiveness is absent. Because Violet refuses to acknowledge the specific cruelty of her class-based interference, the emotional bridge between mother and son remains broken. Her ‘revolution’ of the heart is incomplete, proving that an apology without full accountability is merely a way to maintain social decorum rather than achieve genuine reconciliation.”
Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 7A
Opgeslagen onder Divers
NOTE 6A
[6A]
DEHUMANIZING SIENA ROSSO BY VIOLET
AI
The Confrontation in the Study (Episode 1)
One of the most powerful confrontations takes place in the family study. Violet reminds Anthony of his responsibilities as head of the household and calls him out on his double life:
One of the most powerful confrontations takes place in the family study. Violet reminds Anthony of his responsibilities as head of the household and calls him out on his double life:
- The Confrontation: Violet directly asks Anthony whether, upon leaving the room, he will be returning to his own home or paying a visit to “a certain soprano across town.”
- Violet’s Message: She states that he is neglecting his duties and relying on his younger brothers to ultimately do the work he “cannot” (securing an heir and upholding the family name). She ends with the devastating question of whether he is merely an older brother, or truly the “man of this house.
SEE MY ARTICLE ABOUT THE CONFRONTATION IN THE STUDY
- The Dehumanization: By not mentioning her by name (“a certain soprano”), Violet turned Siena into an object, a scandal, rather than the woman her son loved.
THE SILENCING OF SIENA ROSSO BY VIOLET
AI
Violet’s disparaging attitude is destructive precisely because she rarely lashes out explicitly. She uses passive aggression and manipulative silences to brand Siena as an invisible yet unmistakable ‘sinful distraction’ and a danger to the family.
Here are three specific examples from Season 1, outlined and analyzed to demonstrate how Violet systematically undermines Siena’s dignity:
1. The strategic absence of her name (The tactic of silencing)
In all the scenes where Violet confronts Anthony about his extramarital escapades, she consistently refuses to utter the name ‘Siena.’
In all the scenes where Violet confronts Anthony about his extramarital escapades, she consistently refuses to utter the name ‘Siena.’
- The dynamics: By not calling her by her name, Violet refuses to recognize Siena as a flesh-and-blood human being. In Violet’s eyes, Siena is not a woman with feelings, but an abstract ‘problem’ or a ‘sin’ that needs to be resolved.
- The effect: This is one of the most disparaging forms of exclusion. Violet thereby reduces Siena to a nameless temptation, a temporary illness Anthony must recover from in order to take his duties as Viscount seriously again.
2. The compulsive invocation of Edmund’s legacy (Guilt as a weapon)
Whenever Anthony leaves the ballroom or arrives late for Daphne’s presentation, Violet directly intertwines her reprimands with the memory of his deceased father, Edmund.
Whenever Anthony leaves the ballroom or arrives late for Daphne’s presentation, Violet directly intertwines her reprimands with the memory of his deceased father, Edmund.
- The dynamics: Violet never says directly, “You are with that inferior opera singer.” Instead, with a cold, disappointed look, she says, “Your father should see how you neglect your duties,” or “If you want people to listen to you as Lord Bridgerton, you will have to behave accordingly.”
- The effect: Through this, Violet directly links Siena to Anthony’s moral failure. Without uttering Siena’s name, she turns Siena into the embodiment of Anthony’s guilt. Siena is framed as the obstacle preventing Anthony from becoming his father’s worthy successor.
3. The contrasting praise of ‘respectable’ women (The subtle comparison)
Throughout Season 1, Violet constantly pushes Anthony toward the ‘marriage mart’ and praises the virtues of young debutantes from high society.
Throughout Season 1, Violet constantly pushes Anthony toward the ‘marriage mart’ and praises the virtues of young debutantes from high society.
- The dynamics: During family breakfasts or moments when she reads Lady Whistledown’s Society Papers, Violet speaks highly of the “purity,” “elegance,” and “honorability” of suitable marriage candidates. She does so while looking intently at Anthony.
- The effect: This is a razor-sharp, implicit sneer at Siena. By hammering on what makes a woman ‘respectable’ and ‘virtuous,’ she outlines a perfect profile that Siena — as a working woman and an opera singer without noble status — can never match. She thus indirectly condemns Siena as an ‘unworthy and destructive’ sin.
Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 6A
Opgeslagen onder Divers
NOTES 4A AND 5A
[4A]
[Anthony/talks excitedly]
”Sienna please…..we cannot be together…I know that now this won’t
….shall not be permitted……..but what if we were….find ourselves in another
situation….in a place where you and I might be accepted where not the shame nor
incriminations that this society grants us……..
Would you have me then?
[5A]
AI OVERVIEW
2. The Historical Context: “Social Death”
In the Regency period, “social death” was not a metaphor, but a merciless reality with devastating consequences:
- Family Contamination: If Anthony (the head of the family!) had married an opera singer, he would not be the only one excluded. The entire Bridgerton family would have been struck from all guest lists immediately.
- Marriage Prospects of the Sisters: For Daphne, Eloise, Francesca, and Hyacinth, the damage would be irreparable. No nobleman of standing would propose to a girl whose brother had “married into the gutter.” They would effectively be doomed to a life as unmarried aunts on the sidelines.
- Economic and Political Isolation: A Viscount’s power lay in his network. Without access to the clubs, the balls, and the political circles of the ton, Anthony would completely lose his influence and, with it, the ability to protect his family’s interests.
- The “Demimonde”: Siena belonged to the demimonde (the half-world). While men of the aristocracy were permitted to frequent this world for amusement, crossing the line through marriage was considered the ultimate sin.
OTHER AI OVERVIEW
AI OVERVIEW
Your assessment of the social dynamics in the Bridgerton TV series regarding Anthony Bridgerton and the opera singer Siena Rosso is accurate to the historical context of the Regency Era (1811–1820).
Here is a breakdown of why that relationship was forced into hiding:
- The Reputation of Performers: During the Regency, women who performed on stage—including actresses and opera singers—were frequently viewed as “immoral” or “loose women” by the upper-class “Ton”. Because they performed in public for money and were financially independent, they were seen as improper compared to the secluded, sheltered lives of aristocratic women.
- The “No-Go” Area of Marriage: A marriage between an aristocrat (like a Viscount) and a singer was considered a scandal, often seen as a mésalliance (a marriage with someone of lower social status) that would ruin his family’s reputation. This is why Lady Violet, Anthony’s mother, would have considered such a match an impossibility.
- Public Constraints: The social stigma meant that public outings were forbidden for such couples. They could not “wine and dine” in fashionable Mayfair restaurants, promenade in popular spots like Kew Gardens, or show themselves together at Almack’s.
- Isolation in Private: Due to these extreme social restrictions, their relationship was confined entirely to private spaces, most notably behind closed doors, to avoid ruining Anthony’s standing in society
Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTES 4A AND 5A
Opgeslagen onder Divers
NOTES 1A T/M 3A
[1A]
[2A]
OR
[3A]
AI ABOUT THE SCENE WHERE ANTHONY MEETS SIENA ON THE EVE OF THE DUEL
AI
Siena’s Physical Response: The “Push and Pull”
The scene you are describing (Season 1, Episode 7) is one of the most revealing moments of their relationship, because Siena’s body language contradicts her own words. It perfectly illustrates how she responds to him physically: a mix of survival instinct and irresistible attraction.
1. The Initial Rejection (The Wall)
When Anthony arrives at her door, Siena is physically tense. She grips the doorframe or maintains a strict distance. Her body says: “I cannot handle this anymore; you only bring turmoil.” This is the Siena who is protecting herself from the pain the “Viscount” inflicts upon her.
When Anthony arrives at her door, Siena is physically tense. She grips the doorframe or maintains a strict distance. Her body says: “I cannot handle this anymore; you only bring turmoil.” This is the Siena who is protecting herself from the pain the “Viscount” inflicts upon her.
2. The Turning Point (The Surrender)
As soon as Anthony shows his vulnerability and speaks about the duel and their shared future, her resistance shatters. The way she “pulls him inside” is a reaction born of both hunger and fear. She grabs him, not with the elegance of a Lady, but with the rawness of someone terrified of losing him forever.
As soon as Anthony shows his vulnerability and speaks about the duel and their shared future, her resistance shatters. The way she “pulls him inside” is a reaction born of both hunger and fear. She grabs him, not with the elegance of a Lady, but with the rawness of someone terrified of losing him forever.
3. The Act of Claiming
Once inside, you see that she doesn’t just place her hands on her hips, but often physically “pins him down.” She cups his face or pulls at his clothes. It is a tactile love. To Siena, Anthony is not a title; he is a man of flesh and blood. Her physical reaction is intended to keep him in the “here and now,” far away from the ballrooms and his duties.
Once inside, you see that she doesn’t just place her hands on her hips, but often physically “pins him down.” She cups his face or pulls at his clothes. It is a tactile love. To Siena, Anthony is not a title; he is a man of flesh and blood. Her physical reaction is intended to keep him in the “here and now,” far away from the ballrooms and his duties.
The Contrast with Anthony’s World
While Anthony must always remain “upright” and composed in his own world, he allows himself to be pulled down by Siena (both literally and figuratively, often toward the bed or the sofa). Siena responds to him by physically pulling him out of his role as the Viscount.
Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTES 1A T/M 3A
Opgeslagen onder Divers
Nakba Day Remembrance/It’s still on/About Demonic Zionism and Terror State Israel
ETHNIC CLEANSINGS OF PALESTINIANS [1948]
ETHNIC CLEANSING OF PALESTINE
AFPMédecins Sans Frontières says at least 20 medical facilities across Gaza have been damaged, or forced partially or completely out of service, in the past week
DESTRUCTION OF THE PEOPLE OF GAZA
Getty ImagesCivil defence teams carry a body after the strike in Khan Younis
KILLING OF THE PEOPLE OF GAZA
”THAT FORCED FOUNDATION OF THE JEWISH STATE IN
PALESTINE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE ORIGINAL PALESTINIAN
PEOPLE IS THE ROOT OF THE ISRAELI PALESTINIAN CONFLICT!”
Zionism in a nutshell
NAKBA DAY REMEMBRANCE/IT’S STILL ON/ABOUT DEMONIC ZIONISM AND TERROR STATE ISRAEL
Dear Readers,
Today it’s Nakba Day, the Day we remember the mass eviction of more than
800 000 Palestinians from their Homeland Palestineas a result of the neo colonialistic project they called ”The State of Israel”
And therefore I repost my earlier article about the Evil Results of the neo colonial project called Zionism, leading to the Terror State Israel
It”s still on and the Fight for a Free Palestine will continue!
SEE YOU IN BATTLE READERS!
ASTRID ESSED
THE ARTICLE
DEMONIC ZIONISM GIVES BIRTH TO TERROR STATE ISRAEL!/A TRAVEL
TO A DARK PAST…….
One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
…………………and in the darkness bind them
…………………and in the darkness bind them
[The Ring of Power/Tolkien/Lord of the Rings]
[1A]
[1B]
HISTORICAL OVERVIEW
AT THE CRADLE OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL STOOD ZIONISM, NEO COLONIALISM AND……..EUROPEAN ANTI SEMITISM
This is a Story about neo colonialism [thus mentioned by Astrid Essed since it
happened in the aftermath of 19th century Western colonialism] [1]
A Story about landtheft.
A Story about flagrant violation of the fundamental right of peoples to self determination.
Oddly enough, this Horror Story [as you will read…..] also has its Evil Roots in
another Horror, the centuries old European Antisemitism! [2]
BECAUSE:
The Jewish Austrian journalist Theodor Herzl, founder of the Zionist
Movement [the political movement with as aim the foundation of
a Jewish State in Palestine, then province of the Ottoman Empire] [3] came into action because of the antisemitic Dreyfus Affair [although some modern scholars
mention, that Herzl may have exaggerated the Dreyfuss influence on his
zionism. However that’s of no importance in this article] [4]
Read all about that Dreyfus Affair, note 5
More and more Herzl became convinced of the fact, that in Europe was no
future for the Jews, that anti semitism couldn’t be defeated and that
there was only one Answer to it:
The Foundation of a Jewish State [6]
And so his Magnum Opus [7], Der Judenstaat, was born…..[8]
And in Der Judenstaat he unfolded his ideas about the foundation of
a Jewish State in Palestine, then province of the Ottoman Empire [9]
The idea was, that Palestine was the 2000 years old Homeland of the Jews. [10]
RIGHT TO SELF DETERMINATION
It is hard to imagine for the contemporary 21th century democratic thinking human being:
The GOTSPE [to have the intention to found a State into the country of
someone else, based on a claim of 2000 years ago!
That’s no more or less then trampling on the original Arab Palestinian
people and their right to self determination!
In fact [I wrote it before] a form of neo colonialism , a decision about
the country of someone else and the founding in that country of someone’s else, of another State by force!
AND THAT FORCED FOUNDATION OF THE JEWISH STATE IN
PALESTINE WITHOUT CONSENT OF THE ORIGINAL PALESTINIAN
PEOPLE IS THE ROOT OF THE ISRAELI PALESTINIAN CONFLICT!
As long as this Historical Injustice is not corrected by building a Palestinian
State from the rubble of the Israeli Apartheids State [11] and the Occupied
Palestinian Territories, there is no end to the Conflict!
BUT:
The Reader must understand this well:
Considering the background of 19th Century Thinking, the idea of
founding a State in the land of another People was not strange or extreme, since
colonialism and ideas of white supremacy were considered as ”normal” [12]
ZIONISM, A FATAL MOVEMENT
Theodor Herzl, frontman and leader of the modern political zionism [13],
was a busy guy.
He organized the First Zionist Congress in Basel [14], that laid a solid foundation
for the Zionist Disaster [15]
This Congress was followed by a number of zionist Congresses until
now [for the Herzl period only the first until the six are relevant, since
Herzl died in 1904] [16]
He contacted the Powers That Be in those Times to further promote
the concept of a Jewish State [17]
Among else Herzl approached the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire [18]
However:
His attempts to buy land from the Ottoman Sultan in order to bring his
”Judenstaat” closer, failed. [19]
EVIL ZIONIST MYTH/”A LAND WITHOUT A PEOPLE FOR A PEOPLE
WITHOUT A LAND”
To legitimize their ”Jewish State” ideal tghe zionist Movement
claimed that Palestine was barely. uninhabited.
So it would not be that strange, that persecuted people, in this case
the Jews, would settle in a barely inhabited country to build up a life,
free from prosecution and fear.
And so the Myth was born:
”A LAND WITHOUT A PEOPLE FOR A PEOPLE WITHOUT A LAND” [20]
In reality Palestine was populated since time immemoral by mostly Arab Palestinians as
other people, mixed and living together, forming a flourishing, economical and
cultural society. [21]
The ”A Land without a people for a people without a land” Slogan was
meant to justify the foundation of a State in the country of another people!
Its also called ”Settler colonialism” [22]
THE BRITISH EMPIRE TO THE RESCUE!/THE BALFOUR DECLARATION
”His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”
[23]
Reading this far it should come as no surprise to the Readers that the Zionist Movement for the realization of her [settler] colonial plans was helped by an
important and established Colonial Power in those Times, the British Empire.
Not only settler colonial zionist thinking fitted in British colonial logic [24], of course firstly the
British colonials had their own [geo] political reasons to support Zionism [25]
The Support Thing began with the socalled ”Balfour Declaration” from 1917
[during World War I], which was a Letter from Lord Arthur Balfour, British
foreign secretary, to Lord Rotschild, leader of the British Zionist Movement [26]
In that Letter Lord Balfour guaranteed Lord Balfour to promote ”the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people” [27]
I quote the most important part of the Letter:
””His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object……” [28]
And thus the zionists had a powerful colonial Power on their side!
Of course this ”Balfour Letter” [Balfour Declaration indeed] was a
Monstrosity and fitted well enough in the Colonial Thinking:
Because without in the least considering the rights of the present
population [the Arab Palestines], then still ”belonging” to the Ottoman Empire, a Jewish National Home was created by Colonial Great Britian, for
Jewish people who came from Europe!
The Jewish writer Arthur Koestler wrote about the ”Balfour Declaration”
as follows:
””One Nation solemny promised to a second nation the country
of a third” [29]
I couldn’t have said it better!
THE BRITISH MANDATE FOR PALESTINE
The Palestine Tragedy began to unfold more and more……
After the dismantling of the Ottoman Empire, that bet on the wrong horse [30],
Palestine [that had been part of the Ottoman Empire] became British Mandatory Palestine [31]
YES:
Palestine fell into the hands of the Colonial Power, that made the
”Balfour Declaraion” deal with the zionists…….[32]
And that the British meant business, soon became clear……
For in the Preambule and article 2 of the Mandate Palestine document [under
the responsibility of the League of Nations, established in 1920] [33], was stated, that
the British Mandatary aws responsible for the establishment, in Palestine, for a
Jewish National Home.
I quote from article 2:
”The Mandatory shall be responsible for placing the country under such political, administrative and economic conditions as will secure the establishment of the Jewish national home, as laid down in the preamble, and the development of self-governing institutions, and also for safeguarding the civil and religious rights of all the inhabitants of Palestine, irrespective of race and religion.” [34]
So the Arab Palestinians were in big trouble from the beginning, since
with the rise of nationalist movements in the colonies or semi-colonies
[like mandate areas like Palestine and Syria, results
of that horror Sykes Picot Agreement] [35], for Palestine the cards had already been shuffled:
By the later independence of Palestine, unlike other madate areas like Syria,
Jordan and Iraq [36] , there would not be one independent Palestine, but already ”a Jewish National Home” was included! [37]
And all this without any approval of the original Palestinian people.
THIS WAS COLONIALISM AND SOWED THE SEEDS FOR TROUBLE IN
THE VERY FUTURE…….
JEWISH COLONIZATION
With the establishment of Palestine as ”British Mandatory Palestine” [38]
the way was prepared for the establishment of East and West European
Jews in Palestine.
With the financial means of the Jewish National Fund and wealthy zionist Jews in Europe and the United States land could be purchased from
Palestinian major landowners on behalf of Jewish settler/farmers.
Often those Palestinian landowners themselves didn’t live in Palestine,
but in Lebanon and Syria.[39]
The Palestinian tenants, who had worked on that -purchased- land
paid a high price, since this purchase often was accompanied with their
eviction. [40]
Furthermore there was a dramatic growth of the Jewish population in
Palestine!
UN organisation UNISPAL writes:
”The Jewish population in Palestine increased from 56,000 in 1918 to about 88,000 in 1922, when the total population was officially estimated at 750,000. By 1939, the Jewish population had increased to 445,000 out of a total population of about 1.5 million. This dramatic increase was primarily due to the large numbers of Jews fleeing the Nazi terror.
In percentage terms, the Jewish population rose from about 10 per cent in 1919 to 17 per cent in 1929 to nearly 30 per cent in 1939! [41]
PALESTINE
THE TWENTIES OF THE CENTURY
TO THE THIRTIES AND THE ARAB REVOLT IN PALESTINE!
I wrote it before:
Because of the Balfour Declaration and with the establishment of Palestine as ”British Mandatory Palestine” [42] the seeds for Trouble in
the very future were sown….”
It was inevitable that with the spectacular increasement of the Jewish
colonization in Palestine, all with the blessing of the British authorities [43],
tensions grew between the Jewish migrants, zionists or not [not all Jewish m,igrants were zionists] and the Arab Palestinian population grew.
The Jewish colonization, especially in the thirties continued
to increase dramatically[understandably!] by the danger Nazi Germany formed for the Jews! [44]
In 1936, the year of the uprising against the British Mandate authorities
and the zionist settlers [45], the Jewish population in Palestine consisted
of 384,078, 28,1 percent of the total population [46]
Given the fact of this dramatic immigration increasement, the problem
of the evicted Palestinian tenants and the British favouritism of
Jewish settlement [47], it is no wonder, that Palestinian Arabs stood up against the British Mandatory rulers ![48]
The uprising lasted from 1936 until 1939 and was violently suppressed by the
British Mandatory authorities, who used all sorts of harsh measures
like Martial Law and collective punishment. [49]
Thousands of Arab prisoners were held in administrative detentiion
in overcrowded prisons without proper sanitation. [50]
About the collective punishment:
The main form of collective punishment was destruction of property.
Sometimes even entire villages were reduced to rubble, as happened
to Mi’ar in october 1938!
More often houses were blown.
The biggest ”destruction action” happened in Jaffa on june 1936, making
6000 people homeless……[51]
‘Villages were also frequently punished by fines and confiscation of livestock. [52]
But leave it to British colonialism to make things even worse
and read more about the Al-Bassa massacre
and moreover the description of this warcrime by an eue
witness, a British officer of the Royal Ulster Rifles!
Read and be shocked! [53]
Thus were the ways of British colonialism when it came
to suppress an uprising………
But there is more:
Therefore the reader must keep in mind one of the
main causes of the Arab revolt:
The British favouritism of the zionist settlers! [54]
So of course the zionists were the ”natural” helpers
of the British in suppressing the uprising!
The Zionist Partners in Crime of the British was the Haganah,
a Jewish paramilitary organisation, that actively supported
the British troops.
Although the British administration did not officially recognise the Haganah, the British security forces cooperated with it by forming the Jewish settlement police, Jewish Supernumerary Police and Special Night Squad.
Especially the latter [Special Night Squad] were no more or
less then death sqauds, notorious for their cruelty. [55]
Apparently the British found those zionist gangs so useful, that
they maintained, financed and armed them from this point onward until the end of the Mandate….. [56]
”Useful tools to keep the Arabs down”, they must have thought.
WHAT A PITY [But not really/HAHAHA], that those ”trusted
Zionist friends” of the British would later turn against the very
British Mandatory authorities that had financed and armed them……..[57]
But of course, that is not my Fight.
MY Fight is to defend the Palestinian right of self determination
and show how that was destroyed……..
AFTER WORLD WAR II
THE END
Now we come to the End of our Story about Zionism.
For the attentive reader knows how the Story of the
Palestinian Arab Society and the legitimate right on selfdetermination
ended in a complete disaster, following the end of the British Mandate,
the Partition of Palestine [without any saying of the Arab Palestinian people,
who of course were against], ending in the
foundation of the ”State of Israel” and the Palestinian Nakba, resulting
in the ethnic cleansings of more than 750. 000 Palestinians! [58]
Destroying everything that once was in the Palestinian Society.
BY ZIONISM AND ZIONIST INTRUDERS, WITH THE BLESSING OF BRITISH
COLONIALISM!
READ ALL ABOUT THE NAKBA IN NOTE 59!
We know what happened after 1948!
Israeli terror, occupation, Apartheid and now in Gaza….GENOCIDE! [60]
I am fed up to write about this in detail again.
You only have to watch the news and visit some trustworthy sources….
And after all the intention of this article was to explain and
point out, how a destructive neo colonialistic theory, supported by
a Western country, eventually led to Israeli ethnic cleansings, occupation,
apartheid and thus destroying the Society of Palestine and the legitimate
Right to Selfdetermination!
BUT PALESTINE WILL RISE AGAIN!
”Spear shall be shaken, shield be splintered,
a sword-day, a red day, ere the sun rises!”
[61]
The Palestinian people, led by their resistance groups, will
fight the Israeli armies and win.
LONG LIVE THE LEGITIMATE FIGHT OF LIBERATION!! [62]
ASTRID ESSED
NOTES
NOTE 1A
NOTE 1B
NOTE 1
NOTE 2
NOTES 3 T/M 5
NOTE 6
NOTES 7 T/M 10
NOTE 11
NOTE 12
NOTES 13 T/M 16
NOTES 17 T/M 19
NOTE 20
NOTE 21
NOTE 22
NOTES 23 T/M 25
NOTE 26
NOTES 27 AND 28
NOTE 29
NOTE 30
NOTE 31
NOTES 32 T/M 34
NOTE 35
NOTES 36 AND 37
NOTE 38
NOTE 39
NOTE 40
NOTE 41
NOTES 42 AND 43
NOTE 44
NOTES 45 AND 46
NOTE 47
NOTE 48
NOTES 49 AND 50
NOTES 51 AND 52
NOTE 53
NOTES 54 T/M 57
NOTE 58
NOTE 59
NOTE 60
NOTE 61
NOTE 62
Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Nakba Day Remembrance/It’s still on/About Demonic Zionism and Terror State Israel
Opgeslagen onder Divers
Bridgerton/Astrid Essed about Violet’s toxic relationship [laced with love] with her children/Anthony and Siena/Benedict and Sophie/Francesca and John Stirling
BRIDGERTON/ASTRID ESSED ABOUT VIOLET’S TOXIC RELATION [LACED WITH LOVE] WITH HER CHILDREN/ANTHONY AND SIENA/BENEDICT AND SOPHIE/FRANCESCA AND JOHN STIRLING
SEE ALSO
AI
Astrid Essed is not part of the cast or crew of Bridgerton. Instead, she is a Dutch activist and publicist who writes extensive, critical analyses of the show’s characters.
Through her official website, she publishes in-depth character studies. These pieces specifically highlight the psychological and moral flaws of the elite in the Netflix hit.
Her most prominent analyses focus on the following characters:
- Lady Violet Bridgerton: Essed fiercely criticizes the matriarch, referring to her in essays as “Lady Violent Bridgerton“. She argues that Violet emotionally manipulates and blackmails her children under the guise of “family duty.”
- Anthony Bridgerton: She analyzes his relationship with opera singer Siena Rosso. According to Essed, Violet “dehumanizes” Siena by refusing to say her name. She also claims Anthony’s Season 1 duel stemmed from an unconscious death wish caused by the immense pressure from his mother.
- Other Characters: She dedicates specific essay tags to other family members, including Benedict, Colin, Elo
ise, and Francesca Bridgerton, dissecting their dysfunctional family dynamics.
AI
Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Bridgerton/Astrid Essed about Violet’s toxic relationship [laced with love] with her children/Anthony and Siena/Benedict and Sophie/Francesca and John Stirling
Opgeslagen onder Divers
Astrid Essed about Violet’s toxic [laced with love] relationship with her children/Anthony and Siena/Benedict and Sophie/Francesca and John Stirling
BRIDGERTON/ASTRID ESSED ABOUT VIOLET’S TOXIC RELATION [LACED WITH LOVE] WITH HER CHILDREN/ANTHONY AND SIENA/BENEDICT AND SOPHIE/FRANCESCA AND JOHN STIRLING
SEE ALSO
AI
Astrid Essed is not part of the cast or crew of Bridgerton. Instead, she is a Dutch activist and publicist who writes extensive, critical analyses of the show’s characters.
Through her official website, she publishes in-depth character studies. These pieces specifically highlight the psychological and moral flaws of the elite in the Netflix hit.
Her most prominent analyses focus on the following characters:
- Lady Violet Bridgerton: Essed fiercely criticizes the matriarch, referring to her in essays as “Lady Violent Bridgerton“. She argues that Violet emotionally manipulates and blackmails her children under the guise of “family duty.”
- Anthony Bridgerton: She analyzes his relationship with opera singer Siena Rosso. According to Essed, Violet “dehumanizes” Siena by refusing to say her name. She also claims Anthony’s Season 1 duel stemmed from an unconscious death wish caused by the immense pressure from his mother.
- Other Characters: She dedicates specific essay tags to other family members, including Benedict, Colin, Elo
ise, and Francesca Bridgerton, dissecting their dysfunctional family dynamics.
AI
Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Astrid Essed about Violet’s toxic [laced with love] relationship with her children/Anthony and Siena/Benedict and Sophie/Francesca and John Stirling
Opgeslagen onder Divers