Maandelijks archief: mei 2023

Notes 50 t/m 53/Lord and King

[50]

”After some hesitation, Henry met the exiled Thomas Arundel, former archbishop of Canterbury, who had lost his position because of his involvement with the Lords Appellant.[13] Henry and Arundel returned to England while Richard was on a military campaign in Ireland. With Arundel as his advisor, Henry began a military campaign, confiscating land from those who opposed him and ordering his soldiers to destroy much of Cheshire. Henry initially announced that his intention was to reclaim his rights as Duke of Lancaster, though he quickly gained enough power and support to have himself declared King Henry IV, imprison King Richard (who died in prison, most probably forcibly starved to death[14]) and bypass Richard’s 7-year-old heir-presumptiveEdmund de Mortimer, 5th Earl of March

WIKIPEDIA

HENRY IV OF ENGLAND/ACCESSION

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_IV_of_England#Accession

ORIGINAL SOURCE

WIKIPEDIA

HENRY IV OF ENGLAND

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_IV_of_England

WIKIPEDIA

RICHARD II OF ENGLAND/DEPOSITION

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_II_of_England#Deposition

ORIGINAL SOURCE

WIKIPEDIA

RICHARD II OF ENGLAND

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_II_of_England

[51]

”I have shown above, that it was Henry IV, founder of the House

of Lancaster, who usurped not only the

throne of England by deposing the rightful King Richard II [33],

but also overlooked the rightful heir presumptive, Edmund  Mortimer.

When the right to the throne was justly followed, not King Henry IV,

but Edmund Mortimer had ascended the throne and was probably

succeeded by his nephew Richard, Duke of York.”

THE WARS OF THE ROSES/LANCASTER AND YORK AND THE

RIGHT TO THE THRONE THROUGH FEMALES

ASTRID ESSED

17 FEBRUARY 2015

”CAUSES OF THE WARS OF THE ROSES

CLAIMS TO THE THRONE

THE SONS OF EDWARD III ANF THEIR OFFSPRING

But first the deep rooted enmity, caused by various

claims to the throne.

King Edward III had five sons, The Black Prince  [originally

named Edward of Woodstock], Lionel

of Antwerp , John of Gaunt [first Duke of Lancaster]

Edmund of  Langley [first Duke of York]  and Thomas of Woodstock.

When King Edward III died , his grandson Richard II  [son of the Black Prince]

inherited the throne.

However, his other sons had children too, like Lionel

of Antwerp, John of Gaunt, Edmund of Langley and Thomas of Woodstock.

Inheritance right stated, that the rights to the throne went

from the descendants of the first son of Edward III, then [when

they remained childless] the second son, then the third and so on.

So when Richard II should die childless

 the descendants of Lionel

of Antwerp, the second son of Edward III, would inherit the throne,

And in that spirit Richard II acted.

During his reign, he appointed Roger Mortimer, grandson

of Lionel of Antwerp

[through his mother, Philippa Plantagenet],

as heir presumptive.

However, he died a year before Richard II.

When Richard II was deposed of the throne

by his cousin, Henry Bolingbroke 

[the son of John of Gaunt] and was probably murdered,

Henry Bolingbroke usurped the throne and became the

new king, Henry IV.

The reign of the House of Lancaster  started.

By usurpation.

Not only Henry IV deposed Richard II, he also ignored the rights

of Edmund Mortimer, who, as the son of the late Roger Mortimer,

had inherited the heir presumptive right.”

THE WARS OF THE ROSES/CAUSES OF THE WARS OF

THE ROSES/A TRAVEL TO THE PAST

ASTRID ESSED

3 FEBRUARY 2015

[52]

The Archbishop who walked up with Henry turned around towards the congregation asking if they wanted Henry as King to which they replied loudly: “Yes”. The Archbishop then turned back to Henry and read the 4 articles of the coronation oath to which Henry swore to uphold. At the coronation he made a speech in English. Before this, the official language of the court was French, ever since William I conquered England”

CORONATION.COM

CORONATION OF BRITISH KINGS AND QUEENS

CORONATION OF HENRY IV

http://kingscoronation.com/coronation-henry-iv/

Henry IV, also known as Henry of Bolingbroke was the son of John of Gaunt who was the fourth son of Edward III and the third son to survive to adulthood. His mother was Blanche of Lancaster was a descendant of Henry III.

Henry joined in 1386 a group of opposition leaders to Richard II – the lords appellants – who outlawed Richard’s closest associates and forced the king to accept their counsel. The following year, Henry’s father died. Richard then seized the family estates, depriving Henry of his inheritance and this prompted Henry to invade England. He met little opposition, as many were horrified by the king’s actions. Richard surrendered in August 1399. It was claimed that Richard had abdicated of his own free will. Henry of Bolingbroke thus usurped the throne of England.

Henry’s accession is dated the 30 September 1399. Henry IV was crowned at Westminster Abbey on Monday 13 October 1399. Thomas Arundel, Archbishop of Canterbury performed the ceremony. Henry added a few changes to the coronation. He added the dubbing of 46 knights 2 days before the coronation who had joined him at the Tower of London. They spent the night maintaining a vigil and were ritually bathed, similarly Henry undertook such. The following day they were knighted during morning Sunday mass. Later that day they accompanied Henry in procession to Westminster dressed in matching long green robes and hats trimmed with white fur and decorated with cords and tassels of white silk.

On the afternoon of Sunday 12 Oct the procession from the Tower of London to Westminster took place. Henry rode bare-headed on a white horse wearing a short doublet of gold cloth, a blue garter on his left leg and the badge of the King of France around his neck. Henry was accompanied by over 2000 lords, ladies, knights, clerks and household servants, all wearing new robes together with three times as many horses. The mayor and peoples of London were arranged in fur-trimmed scarlet uniforms and displayed their company badges. Thomas Erpingham carried the sword and Tomas Percy carried the Stewart’s baton. They wore red velvet or silk. The streets were highly decorated and wine flowed through conduits for drinking.

After Henry’s vigil and bath, he began his coronation day by taking confession and hearing three masses. Just before 0900 hrs the monks of Westminster and other clergy went from the Abbey to the palace and waited outside the royal chamber. Henry wearing sandals was then purified with holy oil and incense by the Archbishop of Canterbury and York before being taken to the Abbey. A canopy to which was attached 4 gold bells and made of blue silk was held above Henry by silver poles by four people from Cinque Ports. The Bishop of London carried the sacraments and sang mass. On one side of Henry was young 13 year old Prince Henry carrying the Curtana or coronation sword and on the other side of Henry was the Earl of Northumberland carrying a sword known as the Lancaster sword. John Beaufort, Earl of Somerset and Earl of Warwick carried a sword wrapped in red and bound with golden straps symbolising twofold mercy. Thus Four swords instead of three were carried around the King.

The ceremony was generally based on established custom. On entering the Abbey, the procession moved towards the elevated stage between the transepts covered with crimson cloth. On top of the stage was the coronation throne draped on gold cloth. Henry stepped up on the platform and sat on the throne. The Archbishop who walked up with Henry turned around towards the congregation asking if they wanted Henry as King to which they replied loudly: “Yes”. The Archbishop then turned back to Henry and read the 4 articles of the coronation oath to which Henry swore to uphold. At the coronation he made a speech in English. Before this, the official language of the court was French, ever since William I conquered England. Both left the stage and approached the altar. The paving stones were covered again in gold cloth. Henry upper body clothing was then removed and his hands, chest, shoulders, upper back, arms and head were anointed. The congregation sang Veni Creator Spiritus.

The Ampulla, of solid gold and in the form of an eagle, which contains the oil with which the Archbishop of Canterbury anoints the Sovereign is still in use. It was last used for the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II. It is believed that this same Ampulla was also used for the Coronation of Henry IV in 1399, although design modifications have probably occurred over the centuries.

After the ceremony the feasting began and part way through included the tradition of interruption by the Kings Champion (Sir Thomas Dymock). He entered through the great north door on horseback in full armoury with other knights carrying Henrys sword and shield.

Henry first married Mary de Bohun, daughter of Humphrey de Bohun, 7th Earl of Hereford, and Joan FitzAlan. She was only about 12 years old. It is believed the marriage took place on 5 February 1381, at Mary’s family home of Rochford Hall, Essex or possibly at Arundel Castle. Her coronation details are unknown.

On 7 February 1403 Henry married his second wife, Joanna of Navarre, the daughter of Charles d’Évreux, King of Navarre, at Winchester. On the 26th of the same month, she held her formal entry to London, where she was crowned queen of England by Thomas Arundel, Archbishop of Canterbury.

END OF THE ARTICLE

SEE ALSO THE OTHER SOURCE, CONFIRMING THAT

HENRY IV HELD HIS CORONATION SPEECH IN ENGLISH

YOUTUBE

[HISTORIAN DAN JONES]

REIGN OF TERROR: THE VICIOUS RULE OF RICHARD II/

BRITIAIN’S BLOODIEST HISTORY/TIMELINE

ANOTHER SOURCE, CONFIRMING HENRY IV’S CORONATION SPEECH IN ENGLISH

”Henry’s coronation, on 13 October 1399 at Westminster Abbey,[16] may have marked the first time since the Norman Conquest that the monarch made an address in English.”

WIKIPEDIA

HENRY IV OF ENGLAND/ACCESSION

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_IV_of_England#Accession

ORIGINAL SOURCE

WIKIPEDIA

HENRY VI OF ENGLAND

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_IV_of_England

[53]

”Before this, the official language of the court was French, ever since William I conquered England”

CORONATION.COM

CORONATION OF BRITISH KINGS AND QUEENS

CORONATION OF HENRY IV

http://kingscoronation.com/coronation-henry-iv/

SEE FOR THE WHOLE TEXT, NOTE 52

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Notes 50 t/m 53/Lord and King

Opgeslagen onder Divers

Note 54/Lord and King

[54]

WIKIPEDIA

JOHN, KING OF ENGLAND

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John,_King_of_England

”Stylistically it seems to relate to the twelfth century and is therefore a remarkable survival – the only piece of royal goldsmiths’ work to survive from that century. It was possibly supplied to Henry II or Richard I.”

ROYAL COLLECTION TRUST

THE CORONATION SPOON Second half twelfth century

https://www.rct.uk/collection/31733/the-coronation-spoon#:~:text=The%20anointing%20is%20the%20most,the%20hands%2C%20breast%20and%20head

DESCRIPTION

The silver-gilt spoon has an oval bowl, divided into two lobes, engraved with acanthus scrolls. The bowl is joined to the stem by a stylised monster’s head, behind which the stem flattens into a roundel, flanked by four pearls, and a band of interlaced scrolling, with another monster’s head; the end of the tapering stem is spirally twisted, and terminates in a flattened knop.

The spoon is first recorded in 1349 as preserved among St Edward’s Regalia in Westminster Abbey. Already at this date it is described as a spoon of ‘antique forme’. Stylistically it seems to relate to the twelfth century and is therefore a remarkable survival – the only piece of royal goldsmiths’ work to survive from that century. It was possibly supplied to Henry II or Richard I.

It is unclear from the 1349 inventory whether the spoon at this date was part of the chapel plate or simply a secular object. However, it was clearly never intended for eating or stirring. Its divided bowl and length suggest that it always had a ceremonial purpose, and its presence among the regalia means that it has always been associated with coronations. It may originally have been used for mixing wine and water in a chalice, but it was certainly used for anointing the sovereign during the coronation of James I in 1603, and at every subsequent coronation. One suggestion is that the divided bowl was designed in this fashion so that the archbishop might dip two fingertips into the holy oil.

The spoon remained among the regalia until 1649, when it was sold off (rather than melted down like the other items). It was purchased by a Mr Kynnersley, Yeoman of Charles I’s Wardrobe, for 16 shillings. Kynnersley returned the spoon to Charles II, for use at the coronation in 1661, when the small pearls were added to its decoration. It has remained in use ever since.

The anointing is the most sacred part of the coronation ceremony, and takes place before the investiture and crowning. The Archbishop pours holy oil from the Ampulla (or vessel) into the spoon, and anoints the sovereign on the hands, breast and head. The tradition goes back to the Old Testament which describes the anointing of Solomon by Zadok the Priest and Nathan the Prophet. Anointing was one of the medieval holy sacraments and it emphasised the spiritual status of the sovereign. Until the seventeenth century the sovereign was considered to be appointed directly by God and this was confirmed by the ceremony of anointing. Although the monarch is no longer considered divine in the same way, the ceremony of Coronation also confirms the monarch as the Supreme Governor of the Church of England.

Provenance

Possibly made for Henry II or Richard I. First recorded in the Royal Collection in 1349

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Note 54/Lord and King

Opgeslagen onder Divers

Notes 55 t/m 57/Lord and King

[55]

ROYAL COLLECTION TRUST

THE CORONATION SPOON Second half twelfth century

https://www.rct.uk/collection/31733/the-coronation-spoon#:~:text=The%20anointing%20is%20the%20most,the%20hands%2C%20breast%20and%20head

SEE FOR THE WHOLE TEXT, NOTE 54

[56]

SEE NOTE 54

ROYAL COLLECTION

THE AMPULLA 1661

https://www.rct.uk/collection/themes/trails/the-crown-jewels/the-regalia-of-charles-ii/the-ampulla

The gold Ampulla is used to hold the consecrated oil with which a sovereign is anointed during the coronation ceremony. It is cast in the form of an eagle with outspread wings. The head of the eagle is removable, and there is an opening in the beak for pouring the oil.

The design is based on an earlier, smaller vessel, which was based on a fourteenth-century legend: the Virgin Mary is said to have appeared to St Thomas Becket and presented him with a golden eagle and a vial of oil for anointing future kings of England. Oil from the Ampulla is poured onto the twelfth-century Anointing Spoon (RCIN 31733) at the most sacred moment of the coronation. The gesture of anointing, when the Archbishop touches holy oil onto the head, breast and hands of the sovereign, dates back to the Old Testament Book of Kings, where the anointing of Solomon as King is described.

Provenance

Supplied for the coronation of Charles II in 1661 by the Crown Jeweller, Robert Vyner.

[57]

SEE NOTE 54

ALSO

‘James VI and I (James Charles Stuart; 19 June 1566 – 27 March 1625) was King of Scotland as James VI from 24 July 1567 and King of England and Ireland as James I from the union of the Scottish and English crowns on 24 March 1603 until his death in 1625”

WIKIPEDIA

JAMES VI AND I

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_VI_and_I

WIKIPEDIA 

HOUSE OF STUART

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Stuart

JAMES VI AND I WAS THE SON OF MARY, QUEEN OF SCOTS

WIKIPEDIA

MARY, QUEEN OF SCOTS

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary,_Queen_of_Scots

JAMES VI AND I WAS THE SUCCESSOR OF QUEEN ELIZABETH I

WIKIPEDIA

ELIZABETH I

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_I

SEE FURTHER:

WESTMINSTER ABBEY

AMPULA AND SPOON

https://www.westminster-abbey.org/about-the-abbey/history/coronations-at-the-abbey/spotlight-on-coronations/ampulla-and-spoon

What is significant about an ampulla and spoon? Watch The Reverend Dr James Hawkey, Canon Theologian and Almoner, explain the most symbolic and sacred part of the coronation.

Of all the objects used within coronations, the ampulla and spoon are arguably the most important. They are required for the anointing, which is the most sacred part of the coronation service. Replicas of both objects are on display within the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee Galleries and have been used for hundreds of years.

The ampulla, shaped like an eagle, holds the consecrated oil with which the monarch is anointed. It was made for the coronation of King Charles II in 1661. Unlike the regalia that had to be remade in the 17th century, the spoon is the only item to survive Oliver Cromwell’s destruction of the sacred symbols of monarchy after the English Civil War. It dates back to the early 12th century, and is recorded among objects at the Shrine of St Edward the Confessor in Westminster Abbey in an inventory of 1349.

Anointing is the moment when the archbishop places holy oil on to the head, heart or breast, and hands of the monarch. It is the only part of the coronation service that the congregation are not allowed to watch; during the televised coronation of Queen Elizabeth II in 1953, a canopy was held over the Queen as she was anointed to ensure it could not be seen.

The recipe for the holy oil is secret, but contains oils of orange flowers, roses, jasmine and cinnamon. It is consecrated by a bishop on the coronation day. This sacred blessing, using the ampulla and spoon, is at the heart of the Christian coronation service, demonstrating the connection between the monarch and God

END OF THE ARTICLE

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Notes 55 t/m 57/Lord and King

Opgeslagen onder Divers

Notes 58 t/m 64/Lord and King

[58]

WIKIPEDIA

EDWARD I OF ENGLAND

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_I_of_England

[59]

WIKIPEDIA

STONE OF SCONE

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stone_of_Scone

[60]

”Historically, the artefact was kept at the now-ruined Scone Abbey in Scone, near Perth, Scotland. It was seized by Edward I’s forces from Scone during the English invasion of Scotland in 1296, and was used in the coronation of the monarchs of England as well as the monarchs of Great Britain and the United Kingdom, following the Treaty of Union of 1707”

WIKIPEDIA

STONE OF SCONE

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stone_of_Scone

”In 1296, the English king Edward I seized a block of sandstone from Scone Abbey in Perthshire called the Stone of Scone, or the Stone of Destiny. This stone had been used by Scottish kings for centuries to sit upon when they were crowned. Edward brought the Stone to England and commissioned the Coronation Chair to hold it”

WIKIPEDIA

CORONATION CHAIR/HISTORY

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronation_Chair#History

ORIGINAL SOURCE

WIKIPEDIA

CORONATION CHAIR

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronation_Chair

[61]

”In 1296, the English king Edward I seized a block of sandstone from Scone Abbey in Perthshire called the Stone of Scone, or the Stone of Destiny. This stone had been used by Scottish kings for centuries to sit upon when they were crowned. Edward brought the Stone to England and commissioned the Coronation Chair to hold it”

WIKIPEDIA

CORONATION CHAIR/HISTORY

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronation_Chair#History

ORIGINAL SOURCE

WIKIPEDIA

CORONATION CHAIR

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronation_Chair

[62]

  WESTMINSTER ABBEY

THE CORONATION CHAIR

https://www.westminster-abbey.org/about-the-abbey/history/the-coronation-chair

The Coronation Chair

The Coronation Chair in St George’s Chapel is one of the most precious and famous pieces of furniture in the world. It has been the centrepiece of coronations for over 700 years when it is placed in the centre of the Abbey, in front of the High Altar.

Origins and decoration

The Coronation Chair was made by order of Edward I to enclose the famous Stone of Scone, which he brought from Scotland to the Abbey in 1296, where he placed it in the care of the Abbot of Westminster. The King had a magnificent oaken chair made to contain the Stone in 1300-1301, painted by Master Walter and decorated with patterns of birds, foliage and animals on a gilt ground. The figure of a king, either Edward the Confessor or Edward I, his feet resting on a lion, was painted on the back. The four gilt lions below were made in 1727 to replace the originals, which were themselves not added to the Chair until the early 16th century. The Stone was originally totally enclosed under the seat but over the centuries the wooden decoration had been torn away from the front.

History

At coronations, the Chair – height 2.05m (6 feet 9 inches) – with the Stone stands facing the High Altar. The Chair has been in use at the coronation ceremony since 1308 although opinion is divided as to when it was actually used for the crowning, but this was certainly the case from 1399 when Henry IV was crowned in the Chair.

There have been thirty nine coronation ceremonies for reigning monarchs held at the Abbey (William and Mary were crowned in one ceremony. Edward V, one of the “Princes in the Tower” and Edward VIII, who abdicated, were never crowned). Fifteen queen consorts also had separate coronation ceremonies.

Joint coronation

At the joint coronation of William III and Mary II in 1689 a special chair was made for Mary, as William used the ancient chair. Mary’s chair is on display in the new Queen’s Diamond Jubilee Galleries at the Abbey.

Removal

The ancient Chair was taken out of the Abbey when Oliver Cromwell was installed upon it as Lord Protector in Westminster Hall. It was used by Queen Victoria at the 1887 Golden Jubilee Services in the Abbey. During the Second World War the Chair was evacuated to Gloucester Cathedral and the Stone was secretly buried in the Abbey.

Graffiti and damage

Most of the graffiti on the back part of the Chair is the result of Westminster schoolboys and visitors carving their names in the 18th and 19th centuries. One of the tourists carved “P. Abbott slept in this chair 5-6 July 1800” on the seat.

A bomb attack in 1914 thought to be organised by the Suffragettes even knocked a small corner off it.

Move to St George’s Chapel

The Chair was kept in the Chapel of St Edward the Confessor for many centuries until that chapel was closed to general visitors in 1997. In February 1998 the Chair was moved out to the ambulatory and raised on a modern pedestal near the tomb of Henry V.

In April 2010 it was moved to a specially-built enclosure within St George’s Chapel at the west end of the Nave for essential conservation work. During conservation and cleaning, under the supervision of the Hamilton Kerr Institute, a rare pigment called orpiment was discovered in the compartment which housed the Stone. Tiny traces of vivid colour were found on the Chair. New wooden tracery was put in at the front of the Chair (the original had been missing since the 18th century). It was discovered that originally there was no seat and a cushion on top of the Stone was probably used in earlier times.

Stone of Scone

Legends abound concerning the Stone of Scone. Tradition identifies it with the one upon which Jacob rested his head at Bethel – “And Jacob rose up early in the morning, and took the stone that he had put for his pillows, and set it up for a pillar, and poured oil upon the top of it” (Genesis chapter 28, verse 18). The legend then says that Jacob’s sons carried it to Egypt and from thence it passed to Spain with King Gathelus, son of Cecrops, the builder of Athens. About 700 BC it was said to be in Ireland, whither it was carried by the Spanish King’s son Simon Brech, on his invasion of the island. There it was placed upon the sacred Hill of Tara, and called “Lia-Fail”, the “fatal” stone, or “stone of destiny”, for when the Irish kings were seated on it at coronations the Stone groaned aloud if the claimant was of royal race but remained silent if he was a pretender. Fergus Mor MacEirc (died 501?), the founder of the Scottish monarchy, and one of the Blood Royal of Ireland, received it in Scotland, and Kenneth MacAlpin (died 860) finally deposited it in the monastery of Scone in Perthshire (846).

Setting aside the earlier myths it is certain that it had been for centuries an object of veneration to the Scots. Upon this Stone their kings, down to John Balliol in 1292, were crowned, and it is said that the following words were once engraved on the Stone by Kenneth:

Ni fallat fatum, Scoti, quocunque locatum
Invenient lapidem, regnare tenentur ibidem

[If Fates go right, where’er this stone is found
The Scots shall monarchs of that realm be crowned]

The prophecy was fulfilled at the accession of James VI of Scotland and I of England in 1603. The Stone weighs 152 kg (336 pounds) and is composed of sandstone.

Theft and return to Scotland

It was stolen by Scottish Nationalists on 25th December 1950. After its recovery in April 1951 it was kept in the vault in which it had been stored during the Second World War and was not replaced in the Chair until February 1952, after elaborate precautions had been taken for its future safety.

However, on 3rd July 1996 the Prime Minister (John Major) announced that the Stone of Scone would be returned to Scotland by the end of the year, returning to the Abbey only for coronations. On the evening of 13th November 1996 the Stone was removed from the Chair by representatives of Historic Scotland and put in a specially made crate. It was transported by stretcher to stand in the Lantern of the Abbey overnight and was removed in silence to the waiting police escort early on the morning of 14th November to make the long journey to Scotland by road. It can now be seen in Edinburgh Castle. The Stone was indeed temporarily returned to be re-united with the Chair for the coronation of King Charles III in 2023.

So the Coronation Chair, once the oldest piece of furniture in England still used for the purpose for which it was originally built, now stands empty after 700 years.

Further reading

For further information on the Stone see Edinburgh Castle

(the Stone is due to be moved, probably in 2024, to a new exhibition site in Perth, Scotland)

A Service to to mark the arrival of The Stone of Destiny: Order of Service (PDF, 301KB)

Royalty

The Official site of the British Monarchy

Guide to the Coronation Service (PDF, 18KB)

The Coronation Chair and Stone of Scone. History, archaeology and conservation by Warwick Rodwell, 2013

The Georgianisation of the Coronation Chair by W. Rodwell in “The Georgian” Issue 1, 2013

The Coronation Chair and Stone of Destiny by James Wilkinson, 2006 (available from the Abbey Shop)

The Stone of Destiny – artefact and icon, edited by R. Welander & others, 2003

Scotland’s Stone of Destiny by Nick Aitchison, 2000

The Coronation Chair. An historical and technical enquiry by W. Percival-Prescott, 1957

An in-situ treatment report 2004 and tree ring analysis report 2011 on the Chair are available for consultation at Westminster Abbey Library

WIKIPEDIA

HENRY IV OF ENGLAND

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_IV_of_England

[63]

WESTMINSTER ABBEY

THE CORONATION CHAIR

https://www.westminster-abbey.org/about-the-abbey/history/the-coronation-chair

SEE FOR THE WHOLE TEXT, NOTE 60

SEE ALSO THE NEXT ARTICLE

THE CORONATION CHAIR: HERE’S WHAT YOU NEED TO

KNOW ABOUT THE 700-YEAR OLD ARTIFACT

21 APRIL 2023

https://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/the-coronation-chair-700-year-old-artifact

When King Charles III is coronated on May 6, he’ll do so from a very historic point. The coronation chair, which was commissioned by King Edward I and finished around 1300, has served as the seat for 38 monarchs as they were crowned and is thought to be one of the oldest pieces of British furniture still in use. Made of gilded oak, it’s been painstakingly preserved over centuries and was given a thorough restoration ahead of King Charles III’s crowning. 

“It is one of the oldest surviving artifacts associated with coronations for which we have a complete provenance,” Dr. R. M. Morris, honorary senior research associate at the Constitution Unit of University College London tells AD. Because a great number of coronation items were lost during the interregnum that lasted from 1649 to 1660, little, except for the chair and a spoon used in the ceremony, remains. “It is a remarkable survival and a more than 700-years-old link with an unimaginably remote past, and yet still also a witness to the wonderful fact of the long continuity of our society.”

Late last year, a restoration of the chair, led by Westminster Abbey conservator Krista Blessley, began with the aim of cleaning it and preserving the gilding where it had flaked. The six-foot-nine-tall chair, which resides in Westminster Abbey’s St. George’s Chapel when it’s not in use, was originally designed to hold the Stone of Scone, a Scottish symbol of monarchy that King Edward I captured and brought back to England. It was enclosed in a wood platform that served as the seat of the chair. While the stone was given back to Scotland in 1996, it will be sent from Edinburgh Castle to Westminster Abbey for the coronation. 

The chair features ornate detailing of plants, birds, and other animals. On the back, a king (which is believed to have been Edward I or Edward the Confessor) is depicted. Westminster Abbey curator Susan Jenkins believes the chair’s decoration is its greatest virtue. “You need to get up close to the chair to see the level of detailed decoration that still survives on it. The chair has what is called punchwork and stenciling in the gilding, which originally completely covered it,” she tells AD. “The gilding still shows signs of flowers and birds in delicate markings on the inner and outer sides. It also had colored glass that would have sparkled in the candlelight.” 

Historians see incredible detail in the chair that brings to life the complex history of the royal family. Much would be very easy to miss at first glance. “I think relatively little is known about the chair—about its age and its continual use. Visitors probably don’t realize that a copy of it was made for the coronation of Queen Mary II (Stuart) in 1689, so that she could be crowned alongside her husband, King William III,” Jenkins shares. The queen had a stronger claim to the English throne than Dutch-born William, but he was crowned in the 14th-century chair, and she was crowned in one that was made for her coronation.

Every element of the chair’s design highlights the living history of British royalty and the sanctity with which it is seen. “During the coronation service, the chair is positioned on the Cosmati pavement of the sacrarium and it is the closest seat to the high altar, with its back towards the rest of the congregation,” Jenkins says. “The use of a chair that was commissioned by a king of England over 700 years ago helps to emphasize the ancient and traditional nature of the coronation service and the reverence owed to the monarch.” 

END OF THE ARTICLE

[64]

Origins and decoration

The Coronation Chair was made by order of Edward I to enclose the famous Stone of Scone, which he brought from Scotland to the Abbey in 1296, where he placed it in the care of the Abbot of Westminster. The King had a magnificent oaken chair made to contain the Stone in 1300-1301, painted by Master Walter and decorated with patterns of birds, foliage and animals on a gilt ground”

  WESTMINSTER ABBEY

THE CORONATION CHAIR

https://www.westminster-abbey.org/about-the-abbey/history/the-coronation-chair

SEE FOR THE WHOLE TEXT, NOTE 62

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Notes 58 t/m 64/Lord and King

Opgeslagen onder Divers

Note 65/Lord and King

[65]

ROYAL COLLECTION TRUST

CORONATIONS: AN ANCIENT CEREMONY

The ultimate guide to coronations past and present.

https://www.rct.uk/collection/themes/Trails/coronations-an-ancient-ceremony

What is a coronation?

The coronation ceremony sees the crowning of a new king or queen. This ancient ceremony is an occasion for spectacle and celebration. The English ceremony has remained essentially the same for a thousand years.

The coronation of the new monarch happens several months after their accession. The accession is when a new monarch succeeds to the throne upon the death of the previous king or queen. This time allows for the enormous amount of preparation required to organise and rehearse the ceremony.

For the last nine centuries, the coronation ceremony has nearly always taken place at Westminster Abbey in London. It is normally conducted by the Archbishop of Canterbury. The first English king to be crowned at the Abbey was William the Conqueror in 1066. Thirty-nine coronations have taken place in the Abbey, including that of King Charles III, and forty monarchs have been crowned.

The Coronation Regalia form a key part of the ceremony. These sacred objects which represent the powers and responsibilities of the monarch, are presented to the new king or queen during the service.

What happens during the coronation?

The ceremony traditionally features music, prayers, and hymns in several parts:

Recognition and Oath

The people in the Abbey are asked if they recognise the new monarch and respond with ‘God Save The King’ or ‘God Save The Queen’. The monarch then signs an oath where they promise to rule according to the law and with mercy. The monarch is traditionally wearing the crimson Robe of State.

Following the oath, the monarch sits in the Coronation Chair, made for King Edward I in 1300. The chair historically housed the Stone of Scone, also known as “the Stone of Destiny”. This Stone is an ancient object associated with the kings of Scotland. Since 1996 it has been kept at Edinburgh Castle unless required at a coronation.

Anointing

The monarch is then anointed using the Coronation Spoon with holy oil contained in the Ampulla. The Coronation Spoon is the most ancient item of Coronation regalia.

The choir traditionally sings Handel’s ‘Zadok the Priest’ during this most sacred moment of the coronation. Zadok the Priest was first used for the coronation of George II in 1727.

Investiture and Crowning

The anointing is followed by dressing of the monarch in the spectacular robe of cloth of gold called the Supertunica and the longer Imperial Mantle. The monarch is then presented with other items from the Coronation Regalia.

These includes the gold spurs, the jewelled Sword of Offering and the Armills. The Armills are gold bracelets representing sincerity and wisdom. The monarch also receives the Sovereign’s Orb, a gold globe topped by a cross, as well as a ring and two sceptres.

The ceremony culminates with the placing of the magnificent St Edward’s Crown on the monarch’s head. The monarch then changes into the robe of purple velvet and wears the lighter Imperial State Crown for the rest of the service.

Homage

This is the final part of the coronation. The new monarch moves to the throne chair and senior officials of the United Kingdom pay homage to the newly crowned monarch. They place their hands on the monarch’s knees, swear an allegiance, touch the crown and kiss the monarch’s right hand.

In 1953, Queen Elizabeth II’s husband Prince Philip was the first to pay homage to his wife, pledging his service to her.

Procession

The coronation day has traditionally started with a procession from Buckingham Palace to Westminster Abbey in the Gold State Coach. This coach has been used at every coronation since William IV’s in 1831.

After the service there is traditionally a procession through the streets of London. This allows as many people as possible to see the newly crowned monarch.

Queen Elizabeth II’s Coronation

Queen Elizabeth II was crowned at Westminster Abbey in 1953 following her succession. The queen succeeded to the throne on 6 February 1952 on the death of her father, King George VI.

The coronation took place on 2 June 1953 and it was the first to be broadcast live on television. Twenty-seven million people in the United Kingdom tuned in to watch the ceremony.

“I am sure that this, my Coronation, is not the symbol of a power and a splendour that are gone but a declaration of our hopes for the future, and for the years I may, by God’s Grace and Mercy, be given to reign and serve you as your Queen.”

QUEEN ELIZABETH II ON HER CORONATION DAY, JUNE 2 1953.

King Charles III’s Coronation

The Coronation of His Majesty King Charles III took place on 6 May 2023 at Westminster Abbey. The Coronation reflected the monarch’s role today and looked towards the future, while being rooted in longstanding traditions and pageantry.

The Queen Consort was crowned with The King in a similar but simpler ceremony. She was crowned and received a smaller version of the Sceptre with the Cross. Queen Mary’s Crown was used for the Coronation of Queen Camilla.

END OF THE ARTICLE

ROYAL COLLECTION TRUST

THE CROWN JEWELS: CORONATION AND REGALIA

Everything you need to know about the famous collection.

https://www.rct.uk/collection/themes/Trails/the-crown-jewels-coronation-regalia

What are the Crown Jewels?

The Crown Jewels are the most famous of the nation’s treasures. They include over 100 extraordinary items including orbs, sceptres, and crowns. All are closely connected with the status and role of the monarch. The oldest of these is the 12th-century spoon used to anoint the king or queen at the coronation.

Housed at the Tower of London, the Crown Jewels are the most complete collection of royal regalia in the world. They are used at occasions such as the coronation service and the State Opening of Parliament. Part of the Royal Collection, the Crown Jewels are held in trust by the monarch for the nation.

The Coronation Regalia

At the heart of the Crown Jewels are the Coronation Regalia. These are the sacred objects used in the coronation ceremony. The collection includes St Edward’s Crown, the Imperial State Crown, the Sovereign’s Sceptre with Cross and the Sovereign’s Orb.

St Edward’s Crown

This spectacular solid gold crown is used at the moment of crowning during the coronation ceremony. 

  • It weighs 2.07 kg (nearly 5lb) and is decorated with rubies, amethysts and sapphires.
  • It was made for the Coronation of Charles II in 1661 as a replacement for the medieval crown melted down in 1649, after the execution of Charles I.
  • The lost medieval crown dated back to the 11th century and belonged to the royal saint, Edward the Confessor.
  • St Edward’s Crown was last used for the crowning of King Charles III in 2023.

mperial State Crown

The Imperial State Crown was made for the Coronation of King George VI in 1937 replacing a crown made for Queen Victoria. 

  • The crown is set with 2,868 diamonds, as well as several famous jewels. 
  • It includes St Edward’s Sapphire, said to have been worn in a ring by Edward the Confessor. 
  • The crown also includes the Cullinan II diamond, the second largest stone cut from the great Cullinan Diamond. The Cullinan Diamond is the largest diamond ever discovered.
  • The Imperial State Crown is worn by the monarch to leave Westminster Abbey after the coronation ceremony.

Sovereign’s Sceptre with Cross

The Sovereign’s Sceptre was made for the Coronation of Charles II in 1661 and has been used at every coronation since.

  • The Sceptre includes the magnificent Cullinan I diamond, the largest colourless cut diamond in the world. 
  • In 1911 the Crown Jeweller, Garrard, mounted the diamond in the Sovereign’s Sceptre. The diamond is so large that the Sceptre had to be reinforced to take its weight.

Sovereign’s Orb

The Sovereign’s Orb is a representation of the monarch’s power. It symbolises the Christian world with its cross set on a globe.

  • The gold Orb weighs 1.32kg and is mounted with emeralds, rubies and sapphires surrounded by diamonds and pearls. 
  • During the coronation service, the Orb is placed in the right hand of the monarch. It is then placed on the high altar before the moment of crowning.

Coronation Spoon & Ampulla

The oldest item in the Coronation Regalia is the 12th-century Coronation Spoon.

  • It is the only piece of royal goldsmiths’ work to survive from that century.
  • During the coronation ceremony the spoon is used to anoint the monarch with holy oil.
  • The gold Ampulla or flask holds the holy oil. The head of the eagle is removable with an opening in the beak for pouring the oil into the spoon.

Queen Mary’s Crown

Queen Mary’s stunning Crown is set with 2,200 diamonds.

  • The crown was designed for the Coronation of Queen Mary in 1911.
  • At the 1911 Coronation the crown contained three large diamonds – the Koh-i-nûr, Cullinan III and Cullinan IV. These were later replaced with crystal replicas.
  • The crown was reset with the Cullinan III, IV and V diamonds for the Coronation of King Charles III and Queen Camilla.

The Cullinan Diamond

The magnificent Cullinan Diamond is the largest diamond ever found, weighing 3,106 carats. The diamond was discovered in modern-day South Africa in 1905. It was named after the chairman of the mining company, Thomas Cullinan.

Over a period of eight months, three polishers worked for 14 hours a day to cut and polish nine large stones from the original diamond. In total 97 small brilliants were also created.

The two largest stones are Cullinan I and Cullinan II. They are set in the Sovereign’s Sceptre with Cross and the Imperial State Crown.

What happened to the earlier Crown Jewels?

The medieval Crown Jewels were sold or destroyed in the mid-17th century. 

In 1649, at the close of the English Civil War, Charles I was executed, and items from the Royal Collection were sold by Parliament to fund the new government. Jewels were sold and items of silver and gold were melted down and turned into coins. 

By 1660 the monarchy was restored, and Charles II ordered the creation of new regalia for his Coronation in 1661. These make up a large proportion of the Crown Jewels which can be seen today.

END OF THE ARTICLE

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Note 65/Lord and King

Opgeslagen onder Divers

Notes 66 t/m 77/Lord and King

[66]

WIKIPEDIA

KING’S CHAMPION

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King%27s_Champion

[67]

WIKIPEDIA

WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_the_Conqueror

[68]

When William, the Conqueror — who was also Duke of Normandy — seized the English throne in 1066, he asked his friend Robert Marmion to act as his Champion. Marmion’s role was to literally throw down the gauntlet, openly challenging anyone doubting the new king’s legitimacy, to prove their case through armed combat. In return for putting his life on the line, Marmion was given an estate at Scrivelsby, in Lincolnshire. The grant for this sets out that:

“The manor of Scrivelsby is holden … the service of finding on the day of Coronation, an armed knight who shall prove by his body, if need be, that the King is true and rightful heir to the kingdom.”

MUSEUM OF LONDON

THROWING DOWN THE GAUNTLET: A CORONATION

TRADITION NO MORE

3 MAY 2023

https://www.museumoflondon.org.uk/discover/coronation-tradition-no-more-throwing-down-gauntlet#:~:text=When%20William%2C%20the%20Conqueror%20%E2%80%94%20who,their%20case%20through%20armed%20combat.

Up until 1821, the King’s Champion would openly challenge anyone who doubted the new king’s legitimacy at the Coronation banquet.

Back in the medieval age, knights could and did settle disputes through trial by combat. This formal process began by throwing onto the ground an armoured glove, or gauntlet. If the other person picked it up, the challenge was accepted, and the duel commenced. The victor won not only the fight, but the argument.

The Dukes of Normandy employed selected knights to fight such duels on their behalf, particularly when their right to rule was questioned. So came about one of the more arcane and romantic rituals surrounding the coronation of British monarchs.

When William, the Conqueror — who was also Duke of Normandy — seized the English throne in 1066, he asked his friend Robert Marmion to act as his Champion. Marmion’s role was to literally throw down the gauntlet, openly challenging anyone doubting the new king’s legitimacy, to prove their case through armed combat. In return for putting his life on the line, Marmion was given an estate at Scrivelsby, in Lincolnshire. The grant for this sets out that:

“The manor of Scrivelsby is holden … the service of finding on the day of Coronation, an armed knight who shall prove by his body, if need be, that the King is true and rightful heir to the kingdom.”

Over the centuries, Scrivelsby, and with it the role of Champion, has remained with Marmion’s descendants who, since 1350, have been the Dymoke family. Their family motto is the Latin phrase Pro Rege Dimico, a play on their name, meaning “I contend for the King”.

Traditionally, the challenge took place during the Coronation banquet, held in Westminster Hall. A painting in the Museum of London’s collection shows the scene at George IV’s banquet in 1821. At the centre of events, amidst the medieval splendour of the hall rides, in full armour, Henry Dymoke (acting on behalf of his clergyman father). He is accompanied by Lord Howard of Effingham (the Deputy Earl Marshal), and the Duke of Wellington (the Lord High Constable), both of whom wear ceremonial robes and coronets.

At the far end of the hall, beneath an elaborate canopy, facing the Champion and his entourage, sits King George. Stretching the length of the chamber are rows of tables, at which grandees such as the dukes, marquesses, earls, viscounts and barons sit. Above these are two-tiered galleries for the lords’ wives and the landed gentry. Lady Caroline Greville, whose admission ticket to George’s banquet is in the museum’s collection, would have been seated in one these. Lucky though she may have been to witness the Champion’s challenge, Greville probably left hungry, for those in the galleries did not, apparently, get to eat.

Nevertheless, George IV’s banquet was amongst the most lavish on record, costing around £250,000, or over £14 million in today’s money. The dishes were prepared from 23 kitchens, producing 160 tureens of soup, courses of fish, roast venison, beef, mutton, veal and vegetables, moistened with sauce from 480 gravy boats. Attendees washed all of this down with 9,840 bottles of wine and 100 gallons of iced punch. Anyone not satisfied by all of that could help themselves to any of the 3,721 cold dishes provided, which included hams, pasties, seafood and jellies.

George IV’s coronation was the last time the Champion actually performed the ceremony of throwing down the gauntlet. Ten years later, William IV made significant cuts to expenditure, when he assumed the throne, and the Champion was reduced to more modest duties. At the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II, in 1951, the role of then Champion, John Dymoke, was simply to carry the Royal Standard.

The banquet no longer takes place in Westminster Hall and, in any case, it is unlikely that King Charles III will provide so extravagant a menu for his guests on 6 May. John Dymoke’s son, Francis, will be King’s Champion on this occasion. Buckingham Palace announced on 27 April that he would, like his father, carry the Royal Standard at the coronation. In this way, he will continue a duty performed by his family for the monarch for close to a thousand years.

END OF THE ARTICLE

[69]

“The manor of Scrivelsby is holden … the service of finding on the day of Coronation, an armed knight who shall prove by his body, if need be, that the King is true and rightful heir to the kingdom.”

MUSEUM OF LONDON

THROWING DOWN THE GAUNTLET: A CORONATION

TRADITION NO MORE

3 MAY 2023

https://www.museumoflondon.org.uk/discover/coronation-tradition-no-more-throwing-down-gauntlet#:~:text=When%20William%2C%20the%20Conqueror%20%E2%80%94%20who,their%20case%20through%20armed%20combat.

SEE FOR THE WHOLE TEXT, NOTE 68

[70]

Over the centuries, Scrivelsby, and with it the role of Champion, has remained with Marmion’s descendants who, since 1350, have been the Dymoke family. Their family motto is the Latin phrase Pro Rege Dimico, a play on their name, meaning “I contend for the King”.

MUSEUM OF LONDON

THROWING DOWN THE GAUNTLET: A CORONATION

TRADITION NO MORE

3 MAY 2023

https://www.museumoflondon.org.uk/discover/coronation-tradition-no-more-throwing-down-gauntlet#:~:text=When%20William%2C%20the%20Conqueror%20%E2%80%94%20who,their%20case%20through%20armed%20combat.

SEE FOR THE WHOLE TEXT, NOTE 68

WIKIPEDIA

DYMOKE/HISTORY

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dymoke#History

ORIGINAL SOURCE

”The Dymoke family of the Manor of Scrivelsby in the parish of Horncastle in Lincolnshire holds the feudal hereditary office of King’s Champion. The functions of the Champion are to ride into Westminster Hall at the coronation banquet and challenge all comers who might impugn the King’s title.”

WIKIPEDIA

DYMOKE

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dymoke

[71]

MUSEUM OF LONDON

THROWING DOWN THE GAUNTLET: A CORONATION

TRADITION NO MORE

3 MAY 2023

https://www.museumoflondon.org.uk/discover/coronation-tradition-no-more-throwing-down-gauntlet#:~:text=When%20William%2C%20the%20Conqueror%20%E2%80%94%20who,their%20case%20through%20armed%20combat.

SEE FOR THE WHOLE TEXT, NOTE 68

[72]

”After the coronation ceremony, there was the traditional banquet where “Sir Thomas Dymoke, the hereditary King’s champion, rode into the hall in full armour, flung down his mail gauntlet, and challenged anyone who disputed Edward’s right to do battle with him.””

THE TUDOR SOCIETY

28 JUNE 1461-CORONATION OF EDWARD IV

On Sunday 28th June 1461, Edward IV was crowned king at Westminster Abbey. Edward had been declared king after defeating the Lancastrian forces at the Battle of Towton in March 1461. Edward had made his triumphal state entry into London on Friday 26th June, riding from Lambeth to the Tower of London. Michael D. Miller writes:

“At the gates of the City, he was received by the Lord Mayor and the Aldermen, clad in scarlet robes, accompanied by 400 from the Court of Common Council and the most prominent of the citizens. The solemn and gorgeous procession wound it way slowly through the City streets whilst the people cheered the God-like figure of Edward, so very different from the drab and vacant-eyed creature they had previously seen as their King. Edward looked every inch a King, and a King who would give them a lasting

peace. In him they saw an end to the troubles which had afflicted the Realm in recent years.”1

At the Tower of London, Edward dubbed 32 Knights of the Bath, men who processed before their new king when he made his way to the Abbey to be crowned. The Croyland Chronicle records:

“King Edward, after the festivities of Easter, which he celebrated with great splendour at York, having placed garrisons throughout the whole country in whom he could fully rely, returned, as conqueror, to London. Here he immediately assembled the Parliament, and was crowned at Westminster by the venerable father Thomas, archbishop of Canterbury, and solemnly graced with the diadem of sovereignty.”2

As the Chronicle records, Edward was crowned by Thomas Bourchier, Archbishop of Canterbury, and he was assisted by William Booth, Archbishop of York. After the coronation ceremony, there was the traditional banquet where “Sir Thomas Dymoke, the hereditary King’s champion, rode into the hall in full armour, flung down his mail gauntlet, and challenged anyone who disputed Edward’s right to do battle with him.”3

A beautiful manuscript roll measuring nearly 20 feet in length was produced to celebrated Edward IV’s coronation and you can see photos of it and find out more about it at http://libwww.library.phila.gov/medievalman/Detail.cfm?imagetoZoom=mca2010001.

Here is an extract from my book Illustrated Kings and Queens of England on Edward IV:

Edward IV was born on 28 April 1442 at Rouen and was the son of Richard, Duke of York, and Cecily Neville, and was descended from Edward III through Edward’s second son, Lionel, Duke of Clarence. He became King of England after deposing the Lancastrian king Henry VI twice with the support of his cousin Richard Neville, Earl of Warwick, who was known as “The Kingmaker”.

Edward angered the Earl of Warwick by marrying Elizabeth Woodville, widow of Sir John Grey of Groby, in secret in 1464, ruining Warwick’s plans for a marriage alliance with France. He alienated Warwick further by advancing members of Elizabeth’s family and Warwick turned to Edward’s brother, George, Duke of Clarence, for support. In 1469, Warwick and Clarence led an army against Edward and defeated him at the Battle of Edgecote Moor on 26 July. The Queen’s father and one of her brothers were captured and executed, and Edward was captured at Olney. Warwick lacked support to rule as king and was forced to release Edward. Warwick and Clarence fled to France where they made an alliance with Margaret of Anjou, wife of Henry VI, agreeing to invade England and restore Henry VI to the throne. Henry was restored as king in October 1470, but Edward was able to gain the support of his brother-in-law Charles, Duke of Burgundy, and returned to England with his brother Richard, Duke of Gloucester, and an army. He was able to win support in England and he marched to London, where he took Henry VI captive. He defeated and killed the Earl of Warwick at the Battle of Barnet and the Lancastrian forces at the Battle of Tewkesbury. Clarence was accused of plotting against Edward in 1477 and was put to death, allegedly by being drowned in a butt of malmsey wine, in 1478.

The last years of his reign were once of peace and prosperity, but Edward died suddenly on 9 April 1483 at Westminster but was able to name his brother, Richard of Gloucester, Protector of England while his son was too young to reign in his own right. He was buried in St George’s Chapel, Windsor Castle.

END OF THE ARTICLE

[73]

”The Roger Mortimer case had a direct connection with

Richard, Duke of York , who would fight a bitter fight

with the House of Lancaster for the English throne.

Because through his mother, Anne Mortimer , daughter

of Roger Mortimer, he had

a superior claim to the English throne.

He, his mother and Roger Mortimer were

descendants of Lionel of Antwerp , second son of King Edward III.”

THE WARS OF THE ROSES/CAUSES OF THE WARS OF THE

ROSES/A TRAVEL TO THE PAST

ASTRID ESSED

3 FEBRUARY 2015

[74]

”George IV’s coronation was the last time the Champion actually performed the ceremony of throwing down the gauntlet.”

MUSEUM OF LONDON

THROWING DOWN THE GAUNTLET: A CORONATION

TRADITION NO MORE

3 MAY 2023

https://www.museumoflondon.org.uk/discover/coronation-tradition-no-more-throwing-down-gauntlet#:~:text=When%20William%2C%20the%20Conqueror%20%E2%80%94%20who,their%20case%20through%20armed%20combat.

SEE FOR THE WHOLE ARTICLE, NOTE 68

WIKIPEDIA

GEORGE IV

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_IV

[75]

””LONDON – Francis Dymoke won’t ride into King Charles III’s coronation on horseback and challenge any pretender to the throne to single combat as his ancestor did in 1066, but he will carry the Royal Standard into Westminster Abbey.”

LONDON – Francis Dymoke won’t ride into King Charles III’s coronation on horseback and challenge any pretender to the throne to single combat as his ancestor did in 1066, but he will carry the Royal Standard into Westminster Abbey.

Dymoke, a 67-year-old farmer from eastern England, will be the King’s Champion at the coronation, fulfilling a role performed by members of his family since William the Conqueror was crowned nearly 1,000 years ago. His was one of more than two dozen ceremonial roles announced Thursday by Buckingham Palace as organizers seek to ground the coronation in tradition while also ensuring that it reflects modern Britain.”

KING’S CHAMPION, ORB-BEARER:

PALACE UNVEILS CORONATION ROLES

https://www.local10.com/entertainment/2023/05/04/kings-champion-orb-bearer-palace-unveils-coronation-roles/

LONDON – Francis Dymoke won’t ride into King Charles III’s coronation on horseback and challenge any pretender to the throne to single combat as his ancestor did in 1066, but he will carry the Royal Standard into Westminster Abbey.

Dymoke, a 67-year-old farmer from eastern England, will be the King’s Champion at the coronation, fulfilling a role performed by members of his family since William the Conqueror was crowned nearly 1,000 years ago. His was one of more than two dozen ceremonial roles announced Thursday by Buckingham Palace as organizers seek to ground the coronation in tradition while also ensuring that it reflects modern Britain.

While the first Champion earned his role through long service to the king, Dymoke filled out an online form, explaining his family’s historic role in the coronation, then waited for government bureaucrats to review his claim. Thursday’s announcement means he will be the 34th member of his family to take part in a coronation.

“This is the one moment in my life that really matters,” he told the Daily Telegraph newspaper earlier this year.

Other roles announced Thursday include those who will carry the king’s regalia — including the crown, scepters, orb, swords and spurs — to the altar on May 6.

Some of the jobs went to those with historic claims, like Dymoke, but others will be carried out by senior military officers, bishops and politicians.

For instance, Penny Mordaunt, the leader of the House of Commons, will carry the Sword of State due to her role as Lord President of the Privy Council, which advises the monarch.

Others were awarded to relatively unknown individuals.

Petty Officer Amy Taylor will be the first woman to carry the Sword of Offering into the Abbey after she was chosen to represent service men and women across the country.

“Those undertaking these historic roles in the service have been chosen to recognize, thank and represent the nation due to their significant service, and include representatives from Orders of Chivalry, the military and wider public life,” the palace said.

The King’s Champion originally rode into the coronation banquet on horseback, threw down a gauntlet and challenged anyone who doubted the king or queen’s right to rule.

But there hasn’t been a coronation banquet since 1821, so Champions now perform other roles, usually bearing a flag or standard, the palace said.

The Dymoke family’s traditional claim to the role was linked to the land in Lincolnshire they were awarded at the time of the Norman conquest of England, Dymoke told The Telegraph. But in the modern world, his invitation to the coronation wasn’t guaranteed.

“All I can do is request to take part,” he told the newspaper.

“I wrote along the lines that … my family has done it since William the Conqueror, and though I appreciate it’s not a right any more … it would be a good thing to be involved.”

The palace agreed.

END OF THE ARTICLE

[76]

”“This is the one moment in my life that really matters,” he told the Daily Telegraph newspaper earlier this year.”


KING’S CHAMPION, ORB-BEARER:

PALACE UNVEILS CORONATION ROLES

https://www.local10.com/entertainment/2023/05/04/kings-champion-orb-bearer-palace-unveils-coronation-roles/

SEE FOR THE WHOLE TEXT, NOTE 75

[77]

KING’S CHAMPION, ORB-BEARER:

PALACE UNVEILS CORONATION ROLES

https://www.local10.com/entertainment/2023/05/04/kings-champion-orb-bearer-palace-unveils-coronation-roles/

SEE FOR THE WHOLE TEXT, NOTE 75

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Notes 66 t/m 77/Lord and King

Opgeslagen onder Divers

Notes 78 t/m 80/Lord and King

[78]

WIKIPEDIA

CHARLES III

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_III

[79]

‘”I come not to be served, but to serve,” the King said in his first prayer after reaching the abbey.”

BBC

KING CHARLES AND QUEEN CAMILLA CROWNED IN

HISTORIC CORONATION

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65502234

King Charles and Queen Camilla have been crowned on a historic day of pageantry, capped by cheering from crowds in front of Buckingham Palace.

Thousands packed the Mall despite the rain, after a deeply religious Coronation service at Westminster Abbey and a huge procession through London.

The King and Queen waved from the Palace balcony as the RAF Red Arrows painted the sky red, white and blue.

But the BBC understands Prince Harry was not invited to join them.

The Duke of Sussex had been at the ceremony in the abbey earlier, sitting two rows back from his brother Prince William – the first time they had been seen together since Harry’s sensational memoir, Spare, was released. He left for the US straight afterwards.

The King’s day began shortly after 10:00 BST, with the procession to Westminster Abbey in the horse-drawn Diamond Jubilee State Coach, past cheering crowds and an honour guard of 1,000 members of the armed forces.

Faith leaders and commonwealth leaders began the processions, with the King and Queen following behind.

The two-hour ceremony – the first to crown a monarch in 70 years – was watched on TV around the world, as well as some 2,300 people inside the abbey.

After the crown was placed on Charles’s head cries of “God Save the King” were heard inside and outside, and gun salutes were made across the UK.

Celebrity guests were among those inside Westminster Abbey – including actress Emma Thompson and US singer Katy Perry.

US First Lady Jill Biden and her granddaughter Finnegan arrived in a three-car motorcade, although President Biden did not travel to the UK. French President Emmanuel Macron and First Lady of Ukraine Olena Zelenska were also in the abbey, as were Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and leaders of the Commonwealth countries.

In all, 90 heads of state attended, the Foreign Office said.

The Coronation’s main theme was the importance of service.

“I come not to be served, but to serve,” the King said in his first prayer after reaching the abbey.

Charles was proclaimed as the “undoubted King” in the first stage of the ceremony. The congregation was then asked to show their homage and service, shouting “God Save the King”.

Yet among the music and oaths, there were moments of complete silence as each stage of the ancient ceremony finished.

Traditions rarely seen elsewhere in modern life were maintained – such as the inclusion of the orb and sceptre and the carrying of the gilded Sword of State.

In one part of the service, the King was screened from public for the anointing – seen as the most sacred part of proceedings.

This was where the King was anointed with holy oils by the Archbishop of Canterbury. The need for privacy, the Palace said, was because it “has historically been regarded as a moment between the Sovereign and God”.

While waiting for the anointed King to reappear, choristers sang Handel’s Zadok the Priest – performed at every coronation since 1727.

Prince William also made a pledge of loyalty to King Charles, and kissed him on the cheek, before members of the congregation were invited to offer their own support.

Returning to the Palace, it was a spectacle of pomp and pageantry as the newly crowned King and Queen travelled up The Mall in the Gold State Coach flanked by thousands of servicemen and women.

In total, 4,000 armed forces personnel and 19 military bands took part – making it the biggest state occasion since the coronation of the late Queen in 1953.

Despite the very English weather – constant rain – there was a celebratory atmosphere on The Mall, with periodic Mexican waves and police officers being cheered.

Among the thousands of spectators, many of whom camped overnight for the best viewing spot, was Alexandra Hornyak, 57, from Montreal, Canada.

“I’ve known for years that I would want to attend this day, and the day that it was announced, I was driving to the office, and my husband just called me and said ‘May 6’,” she told the BBC.

“I knew exactly what it was. And I jumped on the phone to get a hotel reservation and we went from there.”

Hours later, the Prince and Princess of Wales tweeted a video of the family’s day, writing: “What. A. Day. Thank you to everyone who made it happen.”

While the vast majority of the assembled crowd came out to cheer the King, there was also a sizeable protest from Republic, the group campaigning to abolish the monarchy and replace it with an elected head of state, and others.

Around six protesters, who were unloading a van of placards, were arrested. In total, the Metropolitan Police said it arrested 52 people for affray, public order offences, breach of the peace and conspiracy to cause a public nuisance around the Coronation.

Acknowledging concerns about the arrests, Commander Karen Findlay defended Scotland Yard’s actions, saying: “Our duty is to do so in a proportionate manner in line with relevant legislation.”

Anti-monarchy groups had defended their right to protest, but the police warned that “tolerance for any disruption, whether through protest or otherwise, will be low”.

“The reports of people being arrested for peacefully protesting the coronation are incredibly alarming”, said Human Rights Watch UK director Yasmine Ahmed.

The Metropolitan Police had 11,500 officers on duty in what it said would be its biggest ever single-day deployment.

The Coronation did not formally change the King’s status. Charles became King of the United Kingdom and 14 other realms in September, when his mother Queen Elizabeth II died after 70 years on the throne.

Since then, months of intense planning went into the celebrations – the 40th coronation to take place at Westminster Abbey since 1066.

This time, the ceremony emphasised diversity and inclusion, with more multi-faith elements than any previous coronation, with contributions from Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist and Sikh representatives.

A Bible lesson was read by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, who is Hindu, and music was sung in Welsh, Scottish Gaelic and Irish.

[80]

WIKIPEDIA

RICHARD NEVILLE. 16TH EARL OF WARWICK

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Neville,_16th_Earl_of_Warwick

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Notes 78 t/m 80/Lord and King

Opgeslagen onder Divers

[Artikel Peter Storm]/Actie tegen steun hulpbisschop Mutsaerts aan fascistenclub JFVD

ACTIE TEGEN STEUN HULPBISSCHOP MUTSAERTS AAN

FASCISTENCLUB JFVD

Vooraf:

Zeer veel waardering voor deze actie en de brief van Peter Storm aan

hulpbisschop Mutsaerts, die mij heeft geinspireerd tot de volgende brief, die ik

hier zo brutaal ben te vermelden

WEBSITE PETER STORM

Geplaatst op 3 mei 2023 door egel

woensdag 3 mei 2023

Vandaag plezierig actie gevoerd op de stoep van Bisdom ‘s Hertogenbosch, in Den Bosch dus. Reden: hulpbisschop Mutsaerts bleek van plan om op 6 mei op een bijeenkomst van de JFVD een ‘kroegcollege’ te komen houden. Wat een kroegcollege is, weet ik niet. Wat de JFVD is weet ik wel: de jongerenclub van het Forum voor Democratie (FVD). En wat het FVD is, weet ik ook een harde fascistische organisatie, die racisme combineert met transhaat, klimaatontkenning, antisemitisme en steun aan Poetins koloniale oorlog in Oekraïne, allemaal om steun te vergaren voor een autoritaire witte etnostaat. Weg met die fascistenclub.

Spreker zijn op een bijeenkomst van die fascistenclub betekent: die fascistenclub helpen aan een spreker, een potentiële publiekstrekker leveren voor die fascistenclub. Door zich als spreker op zo’n bijeenkomst te laten aankondigen, helpt Mutsaerts de FVD. Dat is collaboratie met fascisten. Dat is wat mij betreft onaanvaardbaar. Dus schreef ik een open brief aan Mutsaerts, om hem op te roepen zijn komst op de JFVD-samenkomst af te zeggen.(1) Ik begrijp dat anderen hem ook gemaild hebben met protest. Mooi zo.

Mutsaerts reageerde zowaar op mijn mail: ik snapte het volgens hem niet: dat hij bij de Forum-jeugd op bezoek gaat, betekent nog geen geestverwantschap met dat Forum, hij gaat ook bij andere partijen praten, bladiebla. Mijnheer Mutsaerts negeert daarmee het echte bezwaar. Want wat Mutsaerts ook van het Forum denkt, dat Forum is niet zomaar een partij of groep, maar een fascistenclub. Spreken voor een fascistenclub is die fascisten van steun voorzien. En fascistenclubs hoor je niet van steun te voorzien, als je tenminste niet als collaborateur wilt worden gezien. Vandaar die mails met de oproep aan Mutsaerts om niet te spreken op die bijeenkomst.

Vandaag. 3 mei, gingen we die boodschap dus kracht bij zetten met een actie.(2) Met negen mensen stonden we voor het bisdom. Spandoek: Geen kerksteun aan FVD. Borden van de eerdere antiracisme-campagne ‘Geef Haat Geen Stem’. Een bordje met: ‘Mutsaerts Ga Niet naar JFVD-meeting’, plus wat sfeervolle stickers er op geplakt. Iemand met een ratel, ik met een fluitje. Leuzen roepen, en zingen:

Hey Ho, Take me by the hand 
Strong in solidarity we stand 
Cancel die bijeenkomst, cancel die bijeenkomst!

Het was een kennelijk ter plekke geïmproviseerde variant om een liedje dat je op klimaatacties veel hoort En weer roepen. Toen niet, nu niet, nooit meer fascisme. Het verstuurde persbericht had kennelijk gewerkt, want een verslaggever van het Brabants Dagblad was komen opdagen, nam een foto en deed een interview met mij. Iemand van het Katholiek Nieuwsblad – werkzaam vanuit het gebouw van het bisdom… – deed iets dergelijks.

Voor het gebouw van het bisdom was weinig publiek, en de zon was er weg. Op de hoek van de Sint jan scheen de zon lekker en stonden we langs looproute en tegenover een druk terras. Dus zijn we daar ook nog een tijdje gaan staan. Paar gesprekjes met voorbijgangers. O ja, bij het bisdom was handhaving met een auto even een kijkje komen nemen. Bij de kerk zelf kwam zowaar even een politieauto langs, dus we konden ons weer zeer serieus genomen voelen. De actie was openlijk aangekondigd trouwens, en welbewust niet aangemeld. Dat kan dus gewoon: demonstreren in de volle openbaarheid zonder daarvoor door gemeentelijke bureaucratische hoepels te hoeven springen en verstrikt te raken in overleg, gevolgd door beperkende voorwaarden.

De hele actie duurde pakweg een uurtje Voor een actie die door slechts zeer weinig mensen is georganiseerd, in minder dan een week waarin organisatoren ook allerlei andere dingen te doen hadden, ben ik helemaal niet ontevreden. En eigenlijk is dat nog zachtjes uitgedrukt. Het kan gewoon, met een paar mensen, geen budget en nauwelijks hulpmiddelen protestactie van de grond krijgen, demonstreren op Do It Yourself basis. Het kan gewoon. Echt waar.

Noten:

(1) Peter Storm, ‘Open brief aan hulpbisschop Mutsaerts: geen medewerking aan JFVD-kroegcollege’, 26 april 2023, https://peterstormt.nl/2023/04/26/open-brief-aan-hulpbisschop-mutsaert-geen-medewerking-aan-jfvd-kroegcollege/

(2) ‘3 mei: protest bij bisdom ‘s Hertogenbosch tegen deelname Mutsaerts aan JFVD-bijeenkomst’, Indymedia, 2 mei 2023, https://www.indymedia.nl/node/53346

Peter Storm

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor [Artikel Peter Storm]/Actie tegen steun hulpbisschop Mutsaerts aan fascistenclub JFVD

Opgeslagen onder Divers

Mail Astrid Essed aan NOS dd 3 mei 2023/Uw berichtgeving dd 4 april jongstleden over geweld tegen de politie

null Beeld Joris van Gennip

MAIL ASTRID ESSED AAN NOS DD 3 MEI 2023/”UW BERICHTGEVING

OVER GEWELD TEGEN DE POLITIE”

Astrid Essed <astridessed@yahoo.com>

To:reacties@nos.nl,nosbinnenland@nos.nl,publieksreacties@nos.nl,communicatie@nos.nl

Wed, May 3 at 2:55 AM

De walrus sprak:

De tijd is daar
Om over allerlei te praten”

Een schoen, een schip, een kandelaar,

Of koningen ook liegen

En of de zee soms koken kan

En een biggetje kan vliegen.
Uit het Engels vertaald uit:

 THE WALRUS AND THE CARPENTERLEWIS CARROLL: ALICE IN WONDERLAND
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Walrus_and_the_Carpenter

AAN

REDACTIE NOS NIEUWS

Uw berichtgeving dd 4 april jongstleden:

”Geweld tegen politiemensen blijft hoog: ”Werkt door in

priveleven”

Geachte Redactie,

Ongerijmd. dit fragment uit de onvergetelijke klassieker

Alice in Wonderland? [1]

Dat is niets vergeleken bij uw bovengenoemde berichtgeving [2],

die aan alle kanten rammelt.

Niet alleen neemt u klakkeloos de berichtgeving van de politie

over, zonder deze kritisch te controleren -en er schort nogal

wat aan, zoals u in onderstaande duidelijk zal worden, bovendien

presenteert u in uw berichtgeving de politie -bijna- als een

weerloos slachtoffer, bewust uw ogen sluitend voor het zowel

tegen individuen als bij demonstraties door de politie

gebruikt geweld.

En dat vind ik zeer kwalijk.

Maar eerst uw door mij gewraakte berichtgeving:

UW BERICHTGEVING OVER GEWELD TEGEN DE POLITIE

Ik citeer uit uw berichtgeving:

”In 2019 registreerde de politie 10.624 incidenten, zoals bedreigingen, beledigingen en mishandelingen. In het eerste coronajaar, in 2020, steeg dat aantal naar 12.543. Een jaar later liep het op tot 13.000 incidenten. Afgelopen jaar bleef dat getal ongeveer gelijk: 12.985 incidenten met geweld tegen de politie.”

[3]

Bij de referentie aan 2022  hebt u zich, naar ik aanneem, gebaseerd op het bericht op de politiewebsite ”bijna 13 000 keer

geweld tegen politie in 2022” [4], waarbij u klakkeloos ervan uitgegaan bent, dat het aantal -12 985 incidenten van geweld

tegen de politie” ook klopte.

Wel, Geachte Redactie, niets is minder waar.

En om daar achter te komen, had u slechts de in het

politieartikel vermelde link kunnen aantikken

Deze link

Ik citeer de politiewebsite

”Het overzicht van de cijfers over geweld tegen politieambtenaren is hier te vinden. Daarin zijn de cijfers van de periode 2017 – 2022 opgenomen.” [5]

En als we de in noot 5 vervatte link aanklikken, komen

we bij de volgende tabel:

”Geweld tegen politieambtenaren. [6]

EN WAT ZIEN IK?

[Lees mee, o Redactie]

Woordelijke bedreiging 1084

Belediging 6053

Diefstal 1

Discriminatie 21

Niet voldoen bevel of vordering 73

Smaad 22

Valse aangifte 3

Vernieling 15

Wederspannigheid [vage term] 2835 [7]

Wel, waarde Redactie, sinds wanneer vallen categorieen als

woordelijke bedreiging, belediging, diefstal, smaad, het

doen van een valse aangifte en niet voldoen aan een

bevel of vordering-om maar enkele dwarsstraten

te noemen, onder ”geweld tegen politieambtenaren”?

Als je die aantallen aftrekt van het oorspronkelijke

aantal gevallen van ”geweld”, kom je toch echt tot

een veel lager aantal, zoals ook wordt bevestigd door andere bronnen [8]

POLITIEGEWELD TEGEN INDIVIDUEN EN BIJ DEMONSTRATIES

Het is naar mijn mening niet alleen onachtzaamheid van uw

kant, dat u dit verschil in gegevens en getallen [nota bene

gewoon staand op de politiewebsite [9] niet hebt opgemerkt,

het is ook te wijten aan uw kritiekloze berichtgeving tav de

politie in het algemeen, waardoor u maar klakkeloos uitgaat

van de juistheid van de verstrekte informatie en niet verder]

checkt.

In het verleden heb ik u vaker betrapt op het feit, dat u willens

en wetens [een goed journalist checkt zijn bronnen en doet aan Hoor en Wederhoor] uw ogen sloot voor politiegeweld en

klakkeloos het narratief van de politie maar herhaalde.

Zie de links naar twee mails, die ik u in het verleden stuurde. [10]

EPILOOG

Het niet checken van de juistheid van politiecijfers over

geweld tegen de politie, het uitgaan van de veronderstelling,

zonder overtuigende bewijzen, dat een dodelijk slachtoffer

van politiekogels zijn eigen dood heeft uitgelokt [11],

het zijn zorgwekkende journalistieke omissies, waarvan

een gerenommeerd journalistiek medium zich verre dient te

houden.

Ik spreek dus de hoop uit, neen EIS van u, dat u zich

in de toekomst objectiever en zakelijker over de politie

uitlaat en ophoudt, langer spreekbuis van de politie

[want zo komt het wel over, ik volg u al geruime tijd tav

uw politieberichtgeving] te zijn.

Journalistiek behoort de Waakhond van de democratie te zijn,

en niet het Gezag klakkeloos te verdedigen, zeker niet de politie,

die is toegerust met een Geweldsmonopolie en van alle

mogelijke geweldsmiddelen is voorzien [12]-dus meestal al

in het voordeel is.

Denk daaraan en verbeter uw berichtgeving

Vriendelijke groeten

Astrid Essed

 Amsterdam 

NOTEN

NOTEN 1 EN 2

NOTEN 3 EN 4

NOTEN 5 EN 6

NOTEN 7 EN 8

NOTEN 9 EN 10

NOTEN 11 EN 12

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Mail Astrid Essed aan NOS dd 3 mei 2023/Uw berichtgeving dd 4 april jongstleden over geweld tegen de politie

Opgeslagen onder Divers

”Geweld tegen politiemensen blijft hoog”/NOS’ kritiekloze verdediging van de politie

null Beeld Joris van Gennip

”GEWELD TEGEN POLITIEMENSEN BLIJFT HOOG”/NOS’

KRITIEKLOZE VERDEDIGING VAN DE POLITIE

Brief Astrid Essed aan de NOS

De walrus sprak:

De tijd is daar
Om over allerlei te praten”

Een schoen, een schip, een kandelaar,

Of koningen ook liegen

En of de zee soms koken kan

En een biggetje kan vliegen.
Uit het Engels vertaald uit:

 THE WALRUS AND THE CARPENTERLEWIS CARROLL: ALICE IN WONDERLAND
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Walrus_and_the_Carpenter

AAN

REDACTIE NOS NIEUWS

Uw berichtgeving dd 4 april jongstleden:

”Geweld tegen politiemensen blijft hoog: ”Werkt door in

priveleven”

Geachte Redactie,

Ongerijmd. dit fragment uit de onvergetelijke klassieker

Alice in Wonderland? [1]

Dat is niets vergeleken bij uw bovengenoemde berichtgeving [2],

die aan alle kanten rammelt.

Niet alleen neemt u klakkeloos de berichtgeving van de politie

over, zonder deze kritisch te controleren -en er schort nogal

wat aan, zoals u in onderstaande duidelijk zal worden, bovendien

presenteert u in uw berichtgeving de politie -bijna- als een

weerloos slachtoffer, bewust uw ogen sluitend voor het zowel

tegen individuen als bij demonstraties door de politie

gebruikt geweld.

En dat vind ik zeer kwalijk.

Maar eerst uw door mij gewraakte berichtgeving:

UW BERICHTGEVING OVER GEWELD TEGEN DE POLITIE

Ik citeer uit uw berichtgeving:

”In 2019 registreerde de politie 10.624 incidenten, zoals bedreigingen, beledigingen en mishandelingen. In het eerste coronajaar, in 2020, steeg dat aantal naar 12.543. Een jaar later liep het op tot 13.000 incidenten. Afgelopen jaar bleef dat getal ongeveer gelijk: 12.985 incidenten met geweld tegen de politie.”

[3]

Bij de referentie aan 2022  hebt u zich, naar ik aanneem, gebaseerd op het bericht op de politiewebsite ”bijna 13 000 keer

geweld tegen politie in 2022” [4], waarbij u klakkeloos ervan uitgegaan bent, dat het aantal -12 985 incidenten van geweld

tegen de politie” ook klopte.

Wel, Geachte Redactie, niets is minder waar.

En om daar achter te komen, had u slechts de in het

politieartikel vermelde link kunnen aantikken

Deze link

Ik citeer de politiewebsite

”Het overzicht van de cijfers over geweld tegen politieambtenaren is hier te vinden. Daarin zijn de cijfers van de periode 2017 – 2022 opgenomen.” [5]

En als we de in noot 5 vervatte link aanklikken, komen

we bij de volgende tabel:

”Geweld tegen politieambtenaren. [6]

EN WAT ZIEN IK?

[Lees mee, o Redactie]

Woordelijke bedreiging 1084

Belediging 6053

Diefstal 1

Discriminatie 21

Niet voldoen bevel of vordering 73

Smaad 22

Valse aangifte 3

Vernieling 15

Wederspannigheid [vage term] 2835 [7]

Wel, waarde Redactie, sinds wanneer vallen categorieen als

woordelijke bedreiging, belediging, diefstal, smaad, het

doen van een valse aangifte en niet voldoen aan een

bevel of vordering-om maar enkele dwarsstraten

te noemen, onder ”geweld tegen politieambtenaren”?

Als je die aantallen aftrekt van het oorspronkelijke

aantal gevallen van ”geweld”, kom je toch echt tot

een veel lager aantal, zoals ook wordt bevestigd door andere bronnen [8]

POLITIEGEWELD TEGEN INDIVIDUEN EN BIJ DEMONSTRATIES

Het is naar mijn mening niet alleen onachtzaamheid van uw

kant, dat u dit verschil in gegevens en getallen [nota bene

gewoon staand op de politiewebsite [9] niet hebt opgemerkt,

het is ook te wijten aan uw kritiekloze berichtgeving tav de

politie in het algemeen, waardoor u maar klakkeloos uitgaat

van de juistheid van de verstrekte informatie en niet verder]

checkt.

In het verleden heb ik u vaker betrapt op het feit, dat u willens

en wetens [een goed journalist checkt zijn bronnen en doet aan Hoor en Wederhoor] uw ogen sloot voor politiegeweld en

klakkeloos het narratief van de politie maar herhaalde.

Zie de links naar twee mails, die ik u in het verleden stuurde. [10]

EPILOOG

Het niet checken van de juistheid van politiecijfers over

geweld tegen de politie, het uitgaan van de veronderstelling,

zonder overtuigende bewijzen, dat een dodelijk slachtoffer

van politiekogels zijn eigen dood heeft uitgelokt [11],

het zijn zorgwekkende journalistieke omissies, waarvan

een gerenommeerd journalistiek medium zich verre dient te

houden.

Ik spreek dus de hoop uit, neen EIS van u, dat u zich

in de toekomst objectiever en zakelijker over de politie

uitlaat en ophoudt, langer spreekbuis van de politie

[want zo komt het wel over, ik volg u al geruime tijd tav

uw politieberichtgeving] te zijn.

Journalistiek behoort de Waakhond van de democratie te zijn,

en niet het Gezag klakkeloos te verdedigen, zeker niet de politie,

die is toegerust met een Geweldsmonopolie en van alle

mogelijke geweldsmiddelen is voorzien [12]-dus meestal al

in het voordeel is.

Denk daaraan en verbeter uw berichtgeving

Vriendelijke groeten

Astrid Essed

Amsterdam 

NOTEN

NOTEN 1 EN 2

NOTEN 3 EN 4

NOTEN 5 EN 6

NOTEN 7 EN 8

NOTEN 9 EN 10

NOTEN 11 EN 12

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor ”Geweld tegen politiemensen blijft hoog”/NOS’ kritiekloze verdediging van de politie

Opgeslagen onder Divers